Weird, you need to have one option enable and one other disabled for them to work. The edit message should really be above the signature though. Someone let Geddy know next time you see her.
Yeah, that one, thanks for that, are you going to make a new topic here?Which topic do you mean? If you mean my project thread, my signature link should be fixed.
As someone who's passed a kidney stone, the thought of urethra fucking makes me want to pass out.
Also I'm pretty sure the female urethra is much narrower and shorter than you're imagining it. It's less of a tunnel and closer to a hole. Not that realism has ever stopped you pervs before, I'm just saying.
Even with only the secondhand experience of having to assist with putting in the catheter for my cat on several occasions, I can attest that, judging by his reaction, it was one of the most painful experiences he had to endure, and that includes having his front paw run over by a car.As someone who's passed a kidney stone, the thought of urethra fucking makes me want to pass out.
He certainly wouldn't be this polite about his version of that statement, understandably at that point.Yes. Very much so. I would not ask Savin about it, for your own sake.
Hm, not fully related to this thread, could someone tell me what themes/fetishes/actions/etc are a absolute no-no for TiTS? I haven't found a list for it yet but i would be interested on knowing that.
From Magic Ted's Rules&Junk post.Further more, don't talk about the following submission-banned content; Vore, Under-aged content, Scat unrelated to dem sweet tunes, and gore.
From Magic Ted's Rules&Junk post.
Add to that the soft-ban of watersports and exclude parasites from the bestiality because they are cool in Fen's book.
Edit: Fairy Ninjas strike again.
From my understanding it's something that in reality has zero chances of getting implemented, but is decided on a case by case basis.And is soft-ban like that certain content can be mentioned but not concentrated on?
It's sort of hard to eat something or someone without killing it/them. Vore, even when it's downplayed with stuff like soft vore and absorption vore, is essentially sexualized death. It focuses heavily on other things, but the elements are still there.
If the victim isn't fully digested or otherwise killed, I don't think it would be an issue, especially if done by some kind of goo. I also don't know if it'd be "vore," in that instance, though. But maybe Bad Ends/Dead Ends have a lot more leeway with that kind of thing, I dunno. I sincerely doubt we'd ever see Steele being able to eat a defeated opponent, though. Just typing that strikes me as an obvious no.
Blatant non-con (as opposed to the soft "If I win I'm on top" we roll with in the combat encounters) is the other.
Bestiality in CoC/TiTS is a grey area, and the obvious indicator that the ultimate arbiter in these matters is Fen's penis. He likes tentacle monsters and parasites, so they are allowed, but not obvious animals, so they aren't.
As for as vore is concerned: I think Fen would be fine with soft/absorption variants, e.g. a big galotian gets ahold of you and sucks you dry.Tthere's several bad ends in CoC which play with that theme.
From my understanding it's something that in reality has zero chances of getting implemented, but is decided on a case by case basis.
What is that then, though? I mean, vore is eating someone. Do they have vore where someone just gets swallowed and then... spit back up? I mean, that's already... *shudders*
Uhhh ... If they pass through ... isn't that a form of, well, scat? I hear the "they're not harmed" part, but, that exit plan is ... problematic. Not trying to kink shame, I've just stayed away from vore, never understood the appeal.I mean, soft vore exists, which is when the victim is consumed, but none of that digestion stuff happens, they're either spit back up or pass through without the one being eaten dying. I've seen that a crap ton more than hard vore, which DOES involve ingestion and death (Infact I barely -if ever- see the latter at all, both in art and writing, because death isn't arousing in the slightest. I've stumbled upon only one pic that DOES cover hard vore, but that was only one, most others are basically soft and involve the victim either sitting in the consumers mouth or belly 99.9% of the time and nothing bad happening to the one being ate).
Like Noobie said, Tentacle Pod from CoC is the one example of Soft vore. It's bad end involves consuming you and draining you of sexual fluids, but you still survive in the end after being saved, albeit drained and unable to continue adventuring, but you still live.
Uhhh ... If they pass through ... isn't that a form of, well, scat? I hear the "they're not harmed" part, but, that exit plan is ... problematic. Not trying to kink shame, I've just stayed away from vore, never understood the appeal.
Same, I avoid both of these completely. But the way it was worded left me thinking it'd trigger one rule or the other.I was basically just using the definition in my own words. But I'm not talking about scat at all, ew.
Idk how to explain it without it sounding like that, but you still get the gist of it. Simply put, they get eaten whole and yet still live in the end, because it's all fantasy. I stay away from the fetish myself, most soft vore I've seen of it was thumbnails in art sites mostly, never do I click them though. A few friends of mine are into it, but I don't understand the appeal myself, it's actually a turn off of mine.
Term "vore" is used for any version of "someone being inside of someone else fully or by a large part which is not a sex organ which is ment to be inside". There are things which are technically vore but have nothing to do with eating someone alive for real even temporary, like this (full-body blowjob there).What is that then, though? I mean, vore is eating someone. Do they have vore where someone just gets swallowed and then... spit back up? I mean, that's already... *shudders*
And interesting thing, this is technically hard vore content:Huh, the more you know. To be fair, though, I have seen a fair amount of what is apparently hard vore. I thought the difference between soft and hard was the manner in which someone was eaten (soft being just swallowed whole without gore and hard being... well, eaten normally), and both involved digestion. Almost all the vore I've seen involves the individual that's been eaten being digested, dissolved, or just "disappearing" in a nondescript way.
But, as someone that's not into the fetish, there's a fair chance my exposure to it has been limited to fringe examples.
Vore fans use the word "endosoma", which is short for endosomatophilia. May come handy if one needs to transport people or things.What is that then, though?
If you are gonna count a monster that envelops and restricts you, than proceed to drain your X as vore, you can also call most succubi and tentacle monsters such.And interesting thing, this is technically hard vore content: