The general summary is that it is too much work to carry out your idea, not necessarily because it is bad or something similar. I honestly think they should have told you that as a final point (which is what developers commonly do) from the beginning to avoid wasting time on both sides and do not worry, these conflicts happen very often in this forum and I doubt that it is the last time.I'm already tired so will be just direct.
First I don't get that by posting in this thread I had to write a full document, what do you think is the chance that whatever is said here gets done? zero. I originally thought that it would be fun to comment and other people comment and all that, but it did get into a debate, sometimes not even that about the implementation and how a vaguely defined idea that was.
People, i didn't make a full 100 page document about stuff nor did I prepare how to implement it.
Second the reason I got tired is cause you can say whatever you want but the whole situation is you interpreting the worst possible outcome and not going over that. I just thought sharing an idea could be fun, by no means it is perfect and it would need heavy reviewing and thinking to make it into something okay to implement. So congratulations on showing how an idea in itself isn't ready to implement.
I don't know why did I even bother to enter a debate over something that wasn't even meant for that, on that aspect is my mistake. Would I find it fun that territories could change based on corruption? hell yeah, would I find it fun a more reactive world balanced so that it doesn't get annoying? yeah. Do I expect that to happen? to be fair not at all.
So gonna leave it at that, forget my sin and move along if possible.