Either I haven't played in a while or I'm misremembering and have the memory of a raisin.there's already manual control in the game for companions
Regardless tho, thanks for clearing that up.
Either I haven't played in a while or I'm misremembering and have the memory of a raisin.there's already manual control in the game for companions
My lack of interest in the initially available companions is one of my barriers to getting invested in the game.
I do find companions fun tbh. Having a band of friends to travel and rush into battle with is a sorta feels good that I can't explain. Like knowing that whatever baddies you take on there's always a few by your side to help and support ya.I can't imagine NOT having companions alongside me in this game, its one of the biggest improvements between CoC1 and CoC2.
Honestly though. Because of CoC2, one of my biggest wants for TiTS is the inclusion of companions.I do find companions fun tbh. Having a band of friends to travel and rush into battle with is a sorta feels good that I can't explain. Like knowing that whatever baddies you take on there's always a few by your side to help and support ya.
You don't really get that feeling from games like CoC1 or TiTS because the quests are such solo tasks even when you have followers.
Would be nice, but also, it would require the rebalancing of pretty much the entire game for you to have a partner all the time. Not that it's not doable, there have been sweeping balance changes before (like the rework to lust/tease), but it would require quite a bit of work and I'm fairly certain there are plenty who like the solo aspect of TiTS. I used to prefer TiTS because I disliked the companion system of CoC2 (which was mostly because I first played when the Foothills was the only region, and at the time, you did not have manual control of your companions).Honestly though. Because of CoC2, one of my biggest wants for TiTS is the inclusion of companions.
Like, I like the setting of TiTS way more, but goddamn CoC2 is just much more fun to play.
There's been an entire thread about this, and it seems the majority of the playerbase (at least those that responded to that thread) were basically like "You're an absolute dumbass if you think you should get a bimbo follower, since bimbos are useless in a fight." I do not get why this was so commonly said, considering that, as you point out, there literally is a bimbo version of her available in the game (and also the player can still fight when they're bimboified). As was also said in that thread, albeit at the very end, it feels odd that the corrupt players who want a Bimbo Azzy do not get her as a companion, but the non-corrupt players, who specifically decide against bimboifying her, do get a Bimbo Azzy. Why give something to the players who chose against it, but not to those who desired it?This has probably been asked before but, is there any chance we can get Bimbo Azzy as a follower even if we Corrupt the Hive? It just seems like a shame that she has the move set and personality all set to go but unavailable unless you go pure route. Even if she came with a constant debuff to the player I'd take it.
- This message brought to you by the "Corrupted the Hive before Patch Gang" in solidarity with "Corrupt Nyzerrah is really hot gang"
There have also been entire threads about the death of Flash, TiTS porting to JavaScript, and tutorials on how to use a forum's Search function. Doesn't stop people from not knowing how to use a forum's Search function.There's been an entire thread about this...
Wait, what? Why? Who? Champs can be Bimbos yet remain effective combatants, why not NPCs?Giving non corrupt players the bimbo seems pretty counter intuitive....
But the fact that she can fight and function while temporarily bimboed establishes that she wouldn't be useless as a companion as a permanent bimbo.But Azzy isn't a perma Bimbo in the pure hive route.
But the fact that she can fight and function while temporarily bimboed establishes that she wouldn't be useless as a companion as a permanent bimbo.
There's been an entire thread about this, and it seems the majority of the playerbase (at least those that responded to that thread) were basically like "You're an absolute dumbass if you think you should get a bimbo follower, since bimbos are useless in a fight." I do not get why this was so commonly said, considering that, as you point out, there literally is a bimbo version of her available in the game (and also the player can still fight when they're bimboified). As was also said in that thread, albeit at the very end, it feels odd that the corrupt players who want a Bimbo Azzy do not get her as a companion, but the non-corrupt players, who specifically decide against bimboifying her, do get a Bimbo Azzy. Why give something to the players who chose against it, but not to those who desired it?
it feels odd that the corrupt players who want a Bimbo Azzy do not get her as a companion, but the non-corrupt players, who specifically decide against bimboifying her, do get a Bimbo Azzy. Why give something to the players who chose against it, but not to those who desired it?
Yeah that's what I thought too. Whelp guess I'll just run two play throughs(but then forget about one).
I would like to see the PC have human children if their chosen starting race is human.
That's quite the illogical assumption based on people merely stating that they want human kids. Hell, I'd like to be able to name some of my own kids like you can do in TiTS but that's completely separate from whatever race they are.Because you would probably want a named human child...
Will there be a buffalo version of minotaurs at some point?
Why would you want a named human child specifically over naming all your non-human children?Because you would probably want a named human child, and that's a big investment for a writer since they'll spend their time writing a non sexable character with his own spending time scenes and slowly growing up. It would be like Kinu and not everyone has Tobs dedication.
It's a nursery, not a orphanage. Would have some pretty damn negative connotations if all of your children were put in an orphanage immediately after they were born. >.>Just give people the opportunity to have some human children in the orphanage alongside all the other varieties.