Why dose Takahiro have an option to be removed/ content locked out?
- Thread starter rasputinlovesvodka
- Start date
-
- Tags
- None
I'm sorry—what? [cue surprised pikachu face] Does that legit happen ??
That's not what that means, either.
All Zag was warning against was taking your word as gospel when you haven't seen the relevant document and aren't privy to informed discussions re: its content.
Understandable. It is just that all information about her relating to her becoming our wife/concubine relates to pregnancy and from what I have seen, Tobs seem to be just focusing on it. Combine that with how most of Kitsune content does seem to be made for players with dick in mind, I am really worried that it is going to turn out that way.
And I think that me saying "my intuition" should have made it more then clear enough that what I am saying is based on my own judgement/theory. Maybe a stronger wording was in order.
I was under the impression from the original wording that Rindo only got with Nakano or Hitoshi as a progression of Kinu quest. Granted it's been a while since that was said, it was never said that it's exclusive to Kinu quest that I know of, and there could be details I never saw like in discord. So I could be wrong. I personally hope Rindo would have yuri foxwife content for the non-dick havers. Either way, we must protect Rindo's happiness.
Also, does the "ignore Takahiro" button completely remove him? I get completely disabling the random scenes if only to avoid interrupting the exploration flow, but wouldn't an option to disable those scenes and remove Takahiro be separate?
Also, does the "ignore Takahiro" button completely remove him? I get completely disabling the random scenes if only to avoid interrupting the exploration flow, but wouldn't an option to disable those scenes and remove Takahiro be separate?
About Rindo I really want her to be happy, must protect. As for disabling his contents, it seems to affect only the random ones, you still can talk with him and all that.
Oof, same. I like Rindo but I haven’t had my champ romance her out of fear of being disappointed. I sure do hope that it’s eventually confirmed whether or not she can be wooed if you don’t have Kinu.
yup, that was like, when I read the option to watch, and it came with saying to watch him having "angry" sex. I disabled that same instant, didn't even want to see the full scene. Not that I had seen any of his previous ones too tbh. I don't have the wish to watch random ppl fucking.
I am not sure about it being a part of Kinus Quest (wonder how Rindo engagement will work if you did not free Kiyoko beforehand) but I think originally it was supposed to be that she would only marry Hitoshi or Nakano, and that you were not an option. Not sure what made Tobs to change his mind, but now you can take Rindo under your care. If you refuse, then she ends up with one of the 2 dudes. Wish that I was her, not gonna lie.
I think you should have used "hate sex" instead pf "angry sex". Since latter makes it sound like he was going to rape her. I know that "hate sex" also sounds like that, but I think it is a subset of porn where both parties hate each other yet they fuck, consensually, non the less.
Ah, sorry, yeah, should have used it. My bad, it was not my intention, but regardless, even if the scene may not be what I think it would be, I decided not to risk and just ignore his content.
Screw those dudes, I shall keep Rindo for my champs.. I wonder if Miko will get that option somewhere along the line? Then we can slowly take over the Kitsune den and banish the bastards.
Personally Takahiro is the only unredeemable one, Nanako is just stubborn and refuses to live for himself(and kinu if hime) and not trying to impress the bastard foxes in the old country.
Nope don't like him at all, Takahiro is just a drunken idiot but Nanako is someone I don't like at all..
And I will take Nakano. God, I can just picture him yelling at me day by day, no end in sight, telling me how much he hates me.
Also, keeping his marriage just as a bad end would be a waste.
Also, keeping his marriage just as a bad end would be a waste.
Do we have a "reenable disabled content" button somewhere? If not, I feel like we should. I hate Takahiro but I would like to be able to opt back into his bullshit should he ever get an expansion that makes him not awful.
No need to be rude, my dude. It's been months since I disabled Takahiro and I didn't remember the "permanently remove" part.Save-editing. Or read the text/tooltip(s) and realize that when the writing says 'this will permanently remove X from the game' it means it.
But yeah, save-editing seems to be the go-to strategy. That or making a new Champion.
The smiley at the end of Wolf's comment was meant to neutralize any perceived rudeness, but even without it the comment was completely benign.
Try being a little less sensitive, especially when asking "silly" questions like how to re-enable content that was deliberately disabled. You may not remember having disabled it, but you did disable it and the game made it abundantly clear it would be permanent.
Try being a little less sensitive, especially when asking "silly" questions like how to re-enable content that was deliberately disabled. You may not remember having disabled it, but you did disable it and the game made it abundantly clear it would be permanent.
Takahiro, despite being a fictional character, is now causing problems irl through his tangential involvement. Golly gosh it's no wonder he has a disable option. The absolute mad lad.
Since there was a lot of misinformation here, I wanna just quickly clarify.
1: Takahiro's content isn't stopped/ended if you do this. It just disables his roaming events. This is because people could be annoyed with the sheer amount since it was the only "random event" sequences that happened in the Kitsune colony at the time of implementation.
2: The only reason there might have been a scene at one point with Kiyoko is for two reasons. The first is the companions being off-limits thing, but also because Obs and I saw the reactions going on with the community with anything Kiyoko related and realized it would've been better to not do the original scene. That's it. It's not like I planned it for malicious intent or something like some weirdos seem to imply.
3: Takahiro gets all the girls whether or not you turn the scenes off. Real life sucks. Flawed women and flawed men score all the time and you should just stop being stupid over obvious thots. It's like you people don't realize they're all sluts. Edited Addendum to 3: It should be noted that Miko and Mai are whores, too. Every scene he has was approved by Observer, the creator of these characters. People act like they know them so well, yet Observer was the one who greenlit/confirmed all of these things/scenes as possible and knew the full content within forever ago. You guys don't ask or do research but I'm sure you know more than two writers responsible for the characters involved.
4: As mentioned, he does have an expansion in the future where you sober him up. A sequence of these scenes actually gives you hints/glimmers into the themes of that kit. If you disable them, you'll have no context for when I do get to that part of my backlog. Just food for thought.
1: Takahiro's content isn't stopped/ended if you do this. It just disables his roaming events. This is because people could be annoyed with the sheer amount since it was the only "random event" sequences that happened in the Kitsune colony at the time of implementation.
2: The only reason there might have been a scene at one point with Kiyoko is for two reasons. The first is the companions being off-limits thing, but also because Obs and I saw the reactions going on with the community with anything Kiyoko related and realized it would've been better to not do the original scene. That's it. It's not like I planned it for malicious intent or something like some weirdos seem to imply.
3: Takahiro gets all the girls whether or not you turn the scenes off. Real life sucks. Flawed women and flawed men score all the time and you should just stop being stupid over obvious thots. It's like you people don't realize they're all sluts. Edited Addendum to 3: It should be noted that Miko and Mai are whores, too. Every scene he has was approved by Observer, the creator of these characters. People act like they know them so well, yet Observer was the one who greenlit/confirmed all of these things/scenes as possible and knew the full content within forever ago. You guys don't ask or do research but I'm sure you know more than two writers responsible for the characters involved.
4: As mentioned, he does have an expansion in the future where you sober him up. A sequence of these scenes actually gives you hints/glimmers into the themes of that kit. If you disable them, you'll have no context for when I do get to that part of my backlog. Just food for thought.
Well, ok then. I don't see the problem since I'm just straight up ignoring anything related to Kitsunes after my first playthrough. But still, seeing a creepy having a bunch of scenes played randomly and fucking all the girls just to prove that everyone there is a slut or whore crazy for his dick is something else. XD
Good to know.
Good to know.
He sounds like some of my champs bar the whole drunk thing.. I too would have my way with all the lady foxes in the den..
More were just dumbasses who want to believe what we want, escapism and all that dooda.
That still does not solve writing inconsistencies, it just means to me that two writers approved of them. Miko and Mai are whores, no one here claimed otherwise, but the way they are written is not really in line with how their usual behaviour. From speech to sexual acts, it all seems like an half assed attempt to show "look how cool Taka is!"
Lets not even count how fucked up Nakanos characterization is, in Takas introductory scene no less, for how brief it was. "Champion, I can not blame you for punching Taka in the face. He tots deserve it -smiley face- -thumbs up-". Am I supposed to belive that that is the same Nakano who will not give us a time of the day even if we do some good for colone? Or is the game telling me that Taka is the biggest pest one could fine since even great Nakano can not stand him?
And how he seems to be not subject to all of those so called "secret Kitsune rules and generation defining etiquette". You would think that running naked around in the colony and fucking over other peoples work would get him in trouble. But apparently he is immune to concept of consequences, with how great he is.
And really, do not blame the players for not seeing his full character. First, as someone who read through it, it is not that good to begin with, and I am not just talking about stuff above. It is also not that deep and all of it can be boiled down to "Takahiro should stop drinking because then he could be so much more!"
And mixing a character defining moments with voyeur content does not seem like a such great design. Since not everyone is into the latter. They also seem much less important or noteworthy to his persona since you can remove them. I think most of the randomness could be fixed if you tied it to Takahiros panel. That way, people that want to interact with Takahiro would get his fullest experience.
Lets not even count how fucked up Nakanos characterization is, in Takas introductory scene no less, for how brief it was. "Champion, I can not blame you for punching Taka in the face. He tots deserve it -smiley face- -thumbs up-". Am I supposed to belive that that is the same Nakano who will not give us a time of the day even if we do some good for colone? Or is the game telling me that Taka is the biggest pest one could fine since even great Nakano can not stand him?
And how he seems to be not subject to all of those so called "secret Kitsune rules and generation defining etiquette". You would think that running naked around in the colony and fucking over other peoples work would get him in trouble. But apparently he is immune to concept of consequences, with how great he is.
And really, do not blame the players for not seeing his full character. First, as someone who read through it, it is not that good to begin with, and I am not just talking about stuff above. It is also not that deep and all of it can be boiled down to "Takahiro should stop drinking because then he could be so much more!"
And mixing a character defining moments with voyeur content does not seem like a such great design. Since not everyone is into the latter. They also seem much less important or noteworthy to his persona since you can remove them. I think most of the randomness could be fixed if you tied it to Takahiros panel. That way, people that want to interact with Takahiro would get his fullest experience.
Last edited:
Probably this, Nanako dislikes us for being a outsider, he probably expected you to do that if you ever met Taka, like "yeah he laid him the fuck out".
Nah thats Grandma believe sitting back and doing nothing is going to help him, the other foxes you can talk to about him say as much.
Those 2 are explained at this juncture of his content at least.
I feel that the what he does and what others do are entirely different beasts in terms of mischief. And I am aware that colony is more lax when it comes to "kitsune codex of fuckery" but some stuff he shows, especially to Hitoshi and Kazuo, seems like it at least deserves a time out. He is not a god damn child, he is a grown ass men. Treat him like one.
You see, that would be fine. If Nakano acted in character and if that scene set precident to how rest of Kitsune view him. As some kind of pest. But it does not. Also, how do you fuck up Nakano?
Last edited:
I mean you could say he was a bit different considering how you meet Taka post home invasion, where if you beat him he was going to fucking kill himself for his failure, was probably acting with his defence down AKA the fox he is under all the tryhard weebing.
He does, its why I just want one more event to punch him, now as his keros champ its going to BE EVEN FUNNIER THE SECOND TIME lol.
Socking him in the face isn't going to hit him where it hurts the most. Still say the gourd should be confiscated.
"'Scuse me, this is mine now."
"'Scuse me, this is mine now."