Why not?There's also the question of whether a bimbo/bro Steele would even be capable of consenting to removal of the Ditz/Brute Speech perk (answer: probably not)
Why not?There's also the question of whether a bimbo/bro Steele would even be capable of consenting to removal of the Ditz/Brute Speech perk (answer: probably not)
How about using modified mindwash visor ? I think Lash is bright enough to reprogram that thing to work differentlyAn answer, but not the answer. It's possible to make Lane permanently inaccessible, so ideally we'd need someone/something else capable of removing Ditz/Brute Speech. I'm not saying that Lane couldn't do that (only their author and/or the devs can say that), just that they and Dumb4Cum shouldn't be the only options. Doctor Lash comes to mind...
There's also the question of whether a bimbo/bro Steele would even be capable of consenting to removal of the Ditz/Brute Speech perk (answer: probably not); if they can't, such an option wouldn't make sense from a roleplaying perspective and it would have to be forced upon them somehow, which would be very difficult to set up without violating the player's sense of agency and control over their character.
if steele can willWhy not?
i think lash as the reset button for steele that i don't see why not at some point he could debimbo you.How about using modified mindwash visor ? I think Lash is bright enough to reprogram that thing to work differently
Assuming this is a serious question (which, given that it's you asking, might not be accurate), it's because bimbos are generally too happy/fun-loving and not self-reflective enough (especially regarding downsides to being a bimbo) to think that it's a good idea to get debimbofied. Amma's a perfect example:Why not?
She says this like the possibility of reversing the Treatment has never occurred to her (or anyone else who's ever gotten Treated). While she does attempt to justify this assertion by listing some things that aren't included in other bimbofication drugs, the way other bimbos in the game - including bimbo!Steele - act makes me think they would similarly justify why they don't want to get debimbofied (or, for particularly low-functioning bimbos, try but fail to properly articulate it).Amma's Treatment Talk said:“Is it reversible?”
Amma blinks, completely taken by surprise. “Why would you want to stop being Treated? It’s the best!”
Definitely a possibility, but the consent issue I raised in the second paragraph of my comment still holds.How about using modified mindwash visor ? I think Lash is bright enough to reprogram that thing to work differently
LMAO! Guess this is a case of the boy who cried, "Wokka wokka wokka!" But yes, my question was serious.Assuming this is a serious question (which, given that it's you asking, might not be accurate)...
Valid points. I guess I just always looked at Bimbos/Bimbros as different from those that had undergone the Treatment - not that the Treated aren't necessarily considered Bimbos/Bimbros, just turned that way from a different source. I figured at least some of them could maintain enough self-awareness to know they don't like the person they are and would want to change, just like others know what they are and like it. I guess I kind of looked at them like someone with a dependency issue....it's because bimbos are generally too happy/fun-loving and not self-reflective enough (especially regarding downsides to being a bimbo) to think that it's a good idea to get debimbofied. Amma's a perfect example:
She says this like the possibility of reversing the Treatment has never occurred to her (or anyone else who's ever gotten Treated). While she does attempt to justify this assertion by listing some things that aren't included in other bimbofication drugs, the way other bimbos in the game - including bimbo!Steele - act makes me think they would similarly justify why they don't want to get debimbofied (or, for particularly low-functioning bimbos, try but fail to properly articulate it).
Bros aren't given enough characterisation to definitively say all that for them, but since I view them as the masculine counterpart to bimbos I assume the same holds true.
If it's not a serious question, disregard the above answer.
Could even see a possible "Silly Mode" addition to it breaking the 4th wall and calling out it all being a game.A way to remove Brute/Bimbo Speech & also be able to remove perks like Easy & Weak Will all though a special item that boosts intellect would be neat (If overdosed might cause a "bad" end. I SEE EVERYTHING I KNOW EVERYTHING!!!)
that sounds dangerously like Deadpool, but I like thisCould even see a possible "Silly Mode" addition to it breaking the 3rd wall and calling out it all being a game.
Unless you're whispering, "Line??" to the script supervisor, I'm pretty sure you meant "4th wall"....breaking the 3rd wall...
SHhhh..... You saw nothing. Still be a fun game over.Unless you're whispering, "Line??" to the script supervisor, I'm pretty sure you meant "4th wall".
Funny story, Ditz Speech can be removed.* I don't think there's a way to way to remove Easy or Weak Mind, though. I'm pretty sure Easy and Weak Mind are meant to balance Inhuman Desire, so an item that removed the first two would likely also decrease/remove the latter.A way to remove Brute/Bimbo Speech & also be able to remove perks like Easy & Weak Will all though a special item that boosts intellect would be neat (If overdosed might cause a "bad" end. I SEE EVERYTHING I KNOW EVERYTHING!!!)
Trying to explain balance with a lot of users seems like a futile effort. People stack perks without reading what they do first and then want all the drawbacks removed.I'm pretty sure Easy and Weak Mind are meant to balance Inhuman Desire, so an item that removed the first two would likely also decrease/remove the latter.
Well, I was one of those users back when i was young, the kind that just wants all the perks before even reading them lol. But now? Usually reading does pay off in the long run.Trying to explain balance with a lot of users seems like a futile effort. People stack perks without reading what they do first and then want all the drawbacks removed.
as of right now we have boob/butt swell pads, dicksprout and suma (don't know for other body parts) but a all in one item would be nice for much more convenient.Maybe an easier way to increase size, like how COC had the Gro+. Cuz sorting through all the different TFs are an absolute pain.
Yeah we have Reducto that decreases the size of curtain limbs why don't we have an item that lengthens or makes them girthier?Maybe an easier way to increase size, like how COC had the Gro+. Cuz sorting through all the different TFs are an absolute pain.
I actually don't want this. We already have Throbb and Tittyblossom that do the same thing, and those random side-effects that they give are part of the fun of using them. If the didn't, all my characters would be all boring and generic.Maybe an easier way to increase size, like how COC had the Gro+. Cuz sorting through all the different TFs are an absolute pain.
for me at least i would help in just making the pc to how you want with out fuckingabout with diffrent tfs and save reloading to get what you want. some reason why i want a vag tf itam. the randomness from throbb or gush but sometimes you just want a set size with no fear of a massive growth spurt to size or libido.I actually don't want this. We already have Throbb and Tittyblossom that do the same thing, and those random side-effects that they give are part of the fun of using them. If the didn't, all my characters would be all boring and generic.
Plus, from the in-universe reasoning, what's the point of buying black market dangerous Throbb if you can just buy a safe legal Gro+?
Well I think Gro+ would be more expensive but safe & legal & also works on tails, tongue, ears ect... while Throbb on the other hand would be lower priced though still illegal (and also cause taint and its bad end when you overdose on it).I actually don't want this. We already have Throbb and Tittyblossom that do the same thing, and those random side-effects that they give are part of the fun of using them. If the didn't, all my characters would be all boring and generic.
Plus, from the in-universe reasoning, what's the point of buying black market dangerous Throbb if you can just buy a safe legal Gro+?
Gro+ gets introduced , Throbb dealers be like : Understandable have a nice day.*proceeds to yeet himself out of an airlock*Well I think Gro+ would be more expensive but safe & legal & also works on tails, tongue, ears ect... while Throbb on the other hand would be lower priced though still illegal (and also cause taint and its bad end when you overdose on it).
ps.why doesn't Reducto work on wings yet?
Anti-grav bras exist so yea also could you imagine how many penalties for the pc it would include for having oversized bodyparts and or multiple of them? That would totally ruin the fun , it's already bad enough for smugglers with the preggo reflex reduction .it is a bit odd how if you have a hue bust that it has no effect on the body...
People stack perks without reading what they do first and then want all the drawbacks removed.
Usually mitigation is done in-game, not on the forums though.This is maybe not unreasonable. A lot of folks play the game in different ways. You actually reminded me about folks who stack mutations in Fallout, accumulating them and using serums or perks to stabilize them and mitigate drawbacks.
And yes, while I know that Fallout and TiTS are different games, some of the same people play both, and maybe it's not unreasonable to recognize a playstyle preference that might carry over from game to game.
Assuming this is a serious question (which, given that it's you asking, might not be accurate), it's because bimbos are generally too happy/fun-loving and not self-reflective enough (especially regarding downsides to being a bimbo) to think that it's a good idea to get debimbofied. Amma's a perfect example:
She says this like the possibility of reversing the Treatment has never occurred to her (or anyone else who's ever gotten Treated). While she does attempt to justify this assertion by listing some things that aren't included in other bimbofication drugs, the way other bimbos in the game - including bimbo!Steele - act makes me think they would similarly justify why they don't want to get debimbofied (or, for particularly low-functioning bimbos, try but fail to properly articulate it).
Bros aren't given enough characterisation to definitively say all that for them, but since I view them as the masculine counterpart to bimbos I assume the same holds true.
If it's not a serious question, disregard the above answer.
Definitely a possibility, but the consent issue I raised in the second paragraph of my comment still holds.
Good point, and since it's initiated by player actions (with ideally some warning beforehand), it doesn't really violate player agency.With Lash as the potential vector for debimbofication consent wouldn't really be an issue. I doubt he'd care about getting a bimbo or bros consent to "fix" them. I imagine the scene might even play out like an inverse mirror of Doc Badger's Hero interaction. IE if a bimbo were to annoy lash enough with the right circumstances then rather than initiating combat he might instead opt to initiate some sort of debimbo protocol.
yer. but i think you can tf yourself and get the icy veins perk from the frostfire fox tf.I dunno if it was mentioned before but doesnt it seem strange that frostwyrm tf doesnt give you natural resistance to uveto's weather ?
Ah , yes the good ol' reliable save scumming , thanks my dude :3yer. but i think you can tf yourself and get the icy veins perk from the frostfire fox tf.
at least 25% of both TiTs and CoC2 is spent save resetting for a certain tf.Ah , yes the good ol' reliable save scumming , thanks my dude :3