Second off, Fen's not Ryn's writer, nor is he the head of CoC2's development, Savin is, so unless you have some confirmation that he was told this by Savin, it would be, at most, conjecture from somebody with experience on similar projects.
Apologies for that. Since I was deciding to check the flaws of others earlier, I'll be fair and share one of my own. I have a small array of cognitive disorders due circumstances I will not be discussing since I am a paranoid shit and am fairly certain it would make me too easy to make out on other sites. The worst of such is with name association though, so some days remembering who is called what becomes a fairly interesting endeavor.
I was meaning to talk about Savin, not Fen in this situation, but my brain basically fumbled the ball and slotted in what it could instead, the first and foremost association for 'project lead' when it comes to these games. , I'm typically vigilant enough with double checking to make sure I'm not calling people the wrong things, one of the blessings of speaking through delayed test, but I was annoyed, and in annoyance we tend to make slip ups in our conduct, as I mentioned earlier.
And even if it was exasperation, going off on a 3-paragraph long rant about it is a massive overreaction.
Is it? It's fairly obvious that the tone is annoyance, you don't even need social norms, tone or other chaff and can go by pure pattern recognition given how common it happens to fall upon this conclusion.
3 paragraphs is such a laughably small thing if it's about something you're passionate about, and the reasoning I've written is pretty rationale for that. Acting as they are in this matter is incredibly immature and often counter-productive to their desired role as mouthpiece for the content creators, as helping the team starts with not running a high risk of pissing people away from the forums the moment they ask a question. It is irrational.
For both our sakes, I'm going to believe you can understand this since it's fairly simple stuff, and are just choosing to defend our resident fool on this specific regard because of some personal comradery between you two of you that is overriding basic reasoning. The fact that the only other time you picked to respond to me was the other time I was making out Wolfwhatever to be wrong about something makes this seem like it could be the case, though it is entirely possible it is just a curious coincidence.
Wow, sensitive much? The italics were to point out that this is an issue that's closed, it wasn't intended as an attack on you personally.
No, I'm more disappointed then anything. I know it's not an attack on me personally, if it was a direct insult I just would not care.
It's that sort of tone though, this one your often even more blatant with, that potentially sours the experiences of those you decide to parrot information to when it's a subject that they reasonably could not have know had been talked about lord knows how many times.
I am allowed to call you out on this because you are posting these cases of your own volition, no one is making you. You like the devs and community? Then don't play with ruining people's experiences, this potentially costs the team money in the long run and being a pointless cunt serves no one.
Yes? And? This is a forum for adults and I'm allowed to be snarky on occasion if I want to.
If you want to pull the adult card, how about not in the defense of behavior that has you acting like a whiney brat to people that have done nothing to deserve it.
If that's snarking these days, then I've certainly missed something. Perhaps I need to get with the times, do a bit of snarking of my own. Do we just snark when we've seen people say and ask things that have been said countless times before? Should I snark about your overt 'snarking'? We could be a regular comedy duo, us two.