And how many of those people on the doc are actual characters that exist beyond a five second sex scene or random encounter? The fact is, I'm tired of my COMPANION options being Big Titty Waifu and Quin, Brint and Maybe Ryn. It's a huge disparity, and I'm allowed to state my own preferences.Always has been. So were CoC, TiTS... and Nimin, if it counts! (I never got to play Fall of Eden too much, so I can't really type about it.) It's yet another case of "want it? Write it."
Not feasible, at least companion-wise.
Going by Alypia's Google Document, I'd say that may not be true.
Very few, but it's what happens when nobody writes for them. You can be the change you want to see or commission someone else. I mean, someone from the forum recently wrote scenes for the Crazy Horse(s). It's a good way to test the proverbial waters.And how many of those people on the doc are actual characters that exist beyond a five second sex scene or random encounter?
From the beginning, it was known that companions would come from a certain number of writers. Writers that aren't all that interested in certain archetypes.I'm tired of my COMPANION options being Big Titty Waifu and Quin, Brint and Maybe Ryn.
I would love to be, but honey, I'm disabled and I don't get the luxury to be able to consistently write a ton of sex scenes. I made my piece known, even prefaced it with how unlikely it was to happen, and left. Y'all just can't take any modicum of criticism to this game.Very few, but it's what happens when nobody writes for them. You can be the change you want to see or commission someone else. I mean, someone from the forum recently wrote scenes for the Crazy Horse(s). It's a good way to test the proverbial waters.
From the beginning, it was known that companions would come from a certain number of writers. Writers that aren't all that interested in certain archetypes.
Think about this for a second, do you really want to give Tobs another opportunity to give someone in Casa de G massive unresolved issues? Because you know that he would...the fact there is not a third sibling that does not have lover gender preferances
Discussion over the criticism is not the same as being unable to take criticism. If people disagree they have as much a right to say they do as you do voicing that criticism.Y'all just can't take any modicum of criticism to this game.
Maybe one of these days then, sugar, people will come to understand you.but honey
I happen to be a straight female who is well aware that the game will never cater to her. I waited two years to play it so that it could cater to at least one of my interests (character customisation). CoCII is a solid RPG, and I play it as such. If my Champion's partners are Big Titty Waifu and Big TItty Waifu, so be it. It's not that I am going to interact with them outside battles. But I am aware that, at the end of the day, it's a porn game with a given set of kinks (to the point of predictability), and said kinks won't change unless people get to write.Y'all just can't take any modicum of criticism to this game.
Which is, again, why I unsubbed and made it known WHY I unsubbed. They can do what they want with it, and I'll move on. But I don't play porn games for the RPG elements, I have plenty of RPGs to choose from if I want that. Power to you if that's why you play it, but it's a porn game, and feeling like I get less and less out of it as time goes on and content piles up in categories that don't interest me while I even get content taken from the small pool of stuff I DO like... Well, it's not my idea of fun.I happen to be a straight female who is well aware that the game will never cater to her. I waited two years to play it so that it could cater to at least one of my interests (character customisation). CoCII is a solid RPG, and I play it as such. If my Champion's partners are Big Titty Waifu and Big TItty Waifu, so be it. It's not that I am going to interact with them outside battles. But I am aware that, at the end of the day, it's a porn game with a given set of kinks (to the point of predictability), and said kinks won't change unless people get to write.
At the end of the day, one situation leads to another, and these days have lasted since 2011 (when I first played CoC) at the very least.
Best of luck to you. Not to plug other sites too hard, but F95 has a great filtering system so you can find and try out games from other creators prior to pledging. You can filter for tags, filter tags out, and can even filter by the game engine itself.Which is, again, why I unsubbed and made it known WHY I unsubbed. They can do what they want with it, and I'll move on. But I don't play porn games for the RPG elements, I have plenty of RPGs to choose from if I want that. Power to you if that's why you play it, but it's a porn game, and feeling like I get less and less out of it as time goes on and content piles up in categories that don't interest me while I even get content taken from the small pool of stuff I DO like... Well, it's not my idea of fun.
So I canceled my Patreon sub and I'm leaving. Y'all have fun, I'll check to see how much the disparity increases from here on out. My hands hurt, and I've reached my limit for the day on writing.
The full-time members of the staff get paid, artists get commissioned and presumably there's some infrastructure upkeep that the money also covers, but community writers who submit content do not get paid for that content. It's right there in the form that they require you to sign before you can submit your work.I suppose the team could make more of a call for writers for specific content, Patreon's getting them a nice amount but would that really be in the budget? (I certainly hope they're paying all contributors)
but community writers who submit content do not get paid for that content.
Pretty much. (Meds kicked in.)I have very low view of my times worth and love the game and even I wouldn't work for exposure or for the passion of it. So I now understand why there isn't much of that.
Also feel like all the "Just write it yourself!" Should come with that asterisk.
Originally, CoC1, TiTS, and CoC2 existed in very large part as vehicles for pretty much anybody to write what they wanted to write and get it into a smut game for free. That's what Kiyoko was. In fact, for years, before Observer finally relented and let Savin hire him, he wrote hundreds of thousands of words as essentially a hobby. Other times, written work was commissioned into the game; much like people pay to get art of their OCs, people pay writers to put their OC into the smutgame. BubbleLord probably has the most experience writing on commission for CoC2.I have very low view of my times worth and love the game and even I wouldn't work for exposure or for the passion of it. So I now understand why there isn't much of that.
Also feel like all the "Just write it yourself!" Should come with that asterisk.
You do realize that the inclusion of community submissions is BECAUSE the community wants it? The team has it's writers, and their plans for content. The whole game can be handled with those writers, but if people have something they want to see that the writers don't want to write and want to do it themselves, there's an outlet. If they were forcing all their writers to work for free under the guise of exposure, THEN you'd have a problem, but what's really going on here is they simply provided something that was being asked for by the community itself.An exploitative practice doesn't actually become good or acceptable because it's long running, that kinda makes it worse.
I'm kinda flabbergasted that I'm getting "Writing for exposure is how we all started!" 'cause that's some bs. If it's normalized in your work place that's your work places problem.
We aren't trying to?? We're explaining that this isn't a case of exploiting writers like you seem to really want it to be. People wanted to contribute, for fun, experience, or whatever personal reasons they may have, and they gave them the means to contribute.You're never gonna make "People should be paid for their work" sound unreasonable and I don't know why you'd want to.
I'll have to disagree that anything exploitative is going on here. If Savin et al made vague promises that people would be paid for their submissions and then refused to pony up the dough, then, yeah, that's exploitative. But if people are voluntarily devoting their time to something because they have a passion for it and are not expecting any sort of compensation whatsoever and are submitting content of their own free will, I don't see what's being exploited here. Every single scene in the game has a "Scene by: so-and-so", thus giving full credit to who contributed to the game.An exploitative practice doesn't actually become good or acceptable because it's long running, that kinda makes it worse.
I'm kinda flabbergasted that I'm getting "Writing for exposure is how we all started!" 'cause that's some bs. If it's normalized in your work place that's your work places problem.
That's not what I said, though. I specifically suggested writing on commission, as well. That is paid work.An exploitative practice doesn't actually become good or acceptable because it's long running, that kinda makes it worse.
I'm kinda flabbergasted that I'm getting "Writing for exposure is how we all started!" 'cause that's some bs. If it's normalized in your work place that's your work places problem.
Honestly, the closest analogy to community writing submissions isn't "being employed by a video game company", it's video game mod support. It is optional user-created content (not necessary to complete the game and not even in the game's vision). However, in this case, devs edit your work for free, they make your work canonical, they code it into the game for you (also for free), and, in the case of community NPCs, the devs commission art for the game at their expense but to the writer's specifications (within limits) to suit that NPC. Also, you get in-game name credits, and any Patreon or carrd or commission stuff you may have gets shilled in the official blog. This is so vastly out of proportion to anything that community modders can expect from any video game company that it beggars the mind.It's writing for a video game. You can't say "Working for exposure is how you start out as a writer!" and then say "This doesn't count as professional writing, actually"
It's not a wiki, it's a video game.
So if I have you all right this isn't exploiting actual work which is why people have to wave their right to payment for it.It's right there in the form that they require you to sign before you can submit your work.
That's a lot of ignored nuance to spin volunteer work in a negative light.So if I have you all right this isn't exploiting actual work which is why people have to wave their right to payment for it.
I think Alypia's response to you summed things up the best and I encourage you to give it a proper read if you haven't already. She makes a lot of good points.So if I have you all right this isn't exploiting actual work which is why people have to wave their right to payment for it.
I dunno I think I'm being pretty reasonable but I'm far from a union builder out here bringing labor rights to the place I talk about pat sluttery in and it's no skin off my nose so it's not a cause I'm willing to argue a whole forum of people about.