What content would you like added?

Discussion in 'Corruption of Champions II' started by Raindrops, Apr 1, 2018.

  1. Dragonice

    Dragonice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2017
    This reminds me of the hole Mama Steele thing, but the problem is the kids and not the parent. Plus it would be even more difficult, with the fact that self impregnation would involve every race the PC is.
     
  2. Mugg

    Mugg Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Ye, as i think about it a lil bit more it would be a metric butt ton of work in all the details and small variations.. Damn.

    Still thinks its a good idea tho lol
     
  3. cloer

    cloer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2018
    Speaking of metric...

    It'd be nice to have an option to switch from inches to centimeters...

    I think someone else already mentioned this, so let me second it once more.
     
    Mugg and Kesil like this.
  4. Upcast Drake

    Upcast Drake Well-Known Member
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 27, 2017
    The issue with this comes to writing. There's no easy way to automatically covert "a couple inches" to "a few centimeters" etc. I could fairly easily convert it for raw stat viewing, but then the game would effectively use both systems which would be jarring IMO.
     
  5. Mugg

    Mugg Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    It is kindof an awkward conversion to work with in writing. You'd basicly have to specify to a loose degree. "A couple inches" would have to become "roughly seven or eight centimeters." And then just tag that to a setting in the menus. More tags wooooooooo!
     
    #545 Mugg, Jun 6, 2018
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2018
  6. Lord William

    Lord William New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2015
    Not to beat a dead horse or anything, but regarding the feral discussion before: Would a Harkness-test passing entity that looks like a real world animal be allowed? Say, as an example, a forest spirit that takes on the form of a big wolf? You could talk (or communicate telepathically or something) with it, it is indeed a sapient creature and then engage in consensual (or what passes for consensual in this game) intercourse with it.
     
  7. Upcast Drake

    Upcast Drake Well-Known Member
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 27, 2017
    No. If it looks like a real animal it is not allowed.
     
  8. Raindrops

    Raindrops Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2016
    Legitimate question here, not trying to avoid the rules; Does this imply that if it *doesn't* look like a real animal, it's cool? Like, say, a quadruped chimera or griffin or dragon or whatever. Which of course would be sapient and capable of communicating consent and all that jazz.
     
  9. Upcast Drake

    Upcast Drake Well-Known Member
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 27, 2017
    No. It'd be a case by case basis. A decent guide would be "If it feels like it was created to skirt the rules and get beast content in the game, it's not allowed." Of course, it only matters how we feel about the content, not how you or he or she or they feel about it. It's entirely subjective and up to our discretion.

    If the basis of an idea is "I want more beast-esque content" and you are trying to find some minimum standard that you can get your content to meet and be all clear, it's not going to happen. I'd suggest scrapping the idea.
     
    #549 Upcast Drake, Jun 7, 2018
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2018
    MistyBirb and Raindrops like this.
  10. cloer

    cloer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2018
    Oh for heavens sake, stop trying to inch your way toward what is acceptable. I think from the answers to the whole discussion up to now, it's pretty much safe to say that nothing below "has at least half a humanoid body" is gonna fly in this particular game.

    The best you can hope for is probably something like the Sphinx in the original CoC or a Centaur.

    While of course everyone wants their particular kink represented in it, and as much as possible, of course, lines have been drawn. Once you get a yay or nay, accept it.
    For example, myself: Yeah, I'm a bit dissatisfied that there seems to be a LOT of dick in this game, like, aside from the outright male NPCs/ companions there's traps and shemales and dickgirls and as far as I can remember right now, there's only two "all female" options, one of which you have to lock down your game path for and surrender your soul. Since I am one of those people who don't subscribe to the "The dick only makes it better" philosophy, yeah, not a fan.
    Would it be nice if there were options to "undick" those characters? Sure. But that depends on if the author can see their character being okay with that under certain circumstances. And if they decline, it wouldn't really make me more popular with them if I started trying to get compromises in like "could you make it retractible?" or "could we use shrinking items to make it almost go away?"

    No, my only real option is to, well, not interact with those characters unless necessary in my play. Or not play the game at all.

    In the end, we're lucky they actually ask us for suggestions, so I think the least we can do is respect it when they shoot something down and not start to somehow try to crowbar something we'd like in.


    Well, I said my 2 cents... Now wait and watch me do the thing I just spoke out against myself somewhere down the road.... It'S not easy being perverted...
     
    MistyBirb likes this.
  11. Lord William

    Lord William New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2015
    I'm sorry you feel that way. I do agree that lines must be drawn somewhere, but I hope you can appreciate my desire to know where those lines are drawn. Prior to my question, the most definitive word of God was:

    And I think we can both agree that's not very helpful! I don't want to waste time and effort hoping for something that will get shot down without consideration, and for that I need to know just how the line you mentioned is drawn.

    There is, I believe, a very distinct difference between "literal dog-fucking" and consensually sexing up an intelligent, possibly even verbose and sophisticated creature that happens to look like a dog. Then again, I can also imagine people finding that not to be the case, simply because those intelligent dogs don't exist in the real world. As such, I needed to know which verdict the developers would pass: Is it a dog or is it a "person"? And now I know.
     
    Mugg and Kesil like this.
  12. cloer

    cloer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2018
    There is a very simple set of rules of thumb you can apply, though:
    - If it looks like "X" then it is handled as "X".
    - If it takes more than a cursory glance to tell that it is not "X", it's gonna be treated as "X".
    - When in doubt, no one cares about in depth explanations why "X" is not "X"

    And I think the two answers you quoted were clear enough, considering that. For the same reason you also won't be seeing a character that "magically didn't physically age past 12 years old but don't worry, she's actually 200 years old and had a lot of sex already so she's not an actual loli !"

    IMHO, if you need to find out *exactly* where the line is drawn so you can try to still be "within its bounds", then it'S probably a suggestion not worth mentioning more than once.
     
  13. NotYouNorI

    NotYouNorI Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2015
    Well, as far as pure female companions go there is also Atugia, the dullahan and also I don't think you need to give up your soul to to get Kiyoko. I'm pretty sure that was just the kitsune TF.

    So far the companion options are 3 pure females, 2 pure males, 2 dickgirls/shemales and 1 femherm.
     
    Mugg likes this.
  14. cloer

    cloer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2018
    Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification.
     
  15. Miscellaneous Forum Viewer

    Miscellaneous Forum Viewer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    I'd be quite partial to have more gentle dom or kind master/slave type content and/or relationships. Specifically as a male PC dom/master to whatever sub/slaveNPC(whatever gender). I like to take charge and be in control, but at times the options I see in most games regarding being a Dom usually involves abusing/degrading/humiliating my character's partner. Granted those fetishes do often go hand-in-hand, but while I am a Dom, I am not a sadist. So I'd personally like to see content where the PC is clearly in charge and will "take them in a manly fashion", without the slurs, abuse, and degradation.

    Some other content I'd be curious about/like to see is:
    - Reverse Corruption/Purification
    - "Virgin" playthroughs
    - More human/human-like sexually interactable NPCs
    - the possibility of slower, more romance-focused relationship paths
    - Submissive "bottom" futa/herm NPCs, as opposed to the ones that always wanna dick ya

    A couple less wholesome curiosities:
    - "Being the bull/other man" (I don't know the proper phrasing, but basically being the guy diddling someone else' partner with or without their knowledge/approval)
    - Ejecting companions from the party/ending a relationship in no uncertain terms (Like you don't want Cait or whoever around for whatever reason.)

    I understand completely that these are not going to appeal to everyone, I merely would like insight onto their possibility and/or current inclusion.
     
    MistyBirb and NotYouNorI like this.
  16. Upcast Drake

    Upcast Drake Well-Known Member
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 27, 2017
    No special care will be given to virgin playthroughs, and it's possible that some story event eventually requires you to have sex.

    Other than that everything you listed seems plausible and I'm sure there'll be content that ticks some of them. It'll just depend on what people decide to write.
     
    NotYouNorI likes this.
  17. MistyBirb

    MistyBirb Harpy Princess
    Creator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2016
    This is actually a very solid and reasonable list of wants, tbh. Even the virginity thing, imo, but it's probably obvious why content can't be overly focused on that in a game where the core design focus is getting the player to have sex with things. :p

    I'd love if it could happen, but virginity variants aren't really all that popular, and as much as I'd like to see it, designing entire branches and elements of the plot around the player not having had sex in a porn game just... isn't worth the effort, sadly.

    The word you're looking for (in fetish terms) is "netori," I believe, and it's probably the least objectionable version of cheating/NTR/etc out there. I'm sure it would still make a few people really upset if it showed up, but if there's one thing I've learned from my time in porn communities on the internet, it's that the only way to avoid upsetting people is to not make porn. :p

    As far as including netori in the game goes, I don't personally know of anyone that would write it willingly, but I don't think the idea is banned and I know there's quite a few people around here looking to make a bit of cash for their efforts, so I imagine it would be something you could commission. Of course, Savin may put his foot down and say he doesn't want it in the game at all. You'd have to get it cleared by him, but you have to do that for essentially everything anyways.
     
    Mugg likes this.
  18. Doomknight009

    Doomknight009 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2017
    Since I saw from the Cait gif a while back that it was the "not thicc" version, I have to ask, as a die hard fan of big girls, how far are we going to be able to take that?

    I hesitate to thrown numbers around, but I would dearly like the option to push my kitty-lover into the 'fat' realm. Like, legitimately fat, not "thicc" or "THICC," but actually fat. I figure I'm probably in a vast minority on that, but, well, that's what this thread is for.
     
  19. Miscellaneous Forum Viewer

    Miscellaneous Forum Viewer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    I appreciate the fairly quick responses. I'm not dead-set on a virgin playthrough, merely curious as to whether or not it'd be feasible and I have no intention of begging for special treatment, just tryin' to learn what I can about the direction. The possibility of me being able to commission some of my curiosities are unlikely due to funds, but more likely than me being able to contribute myself as I am not a writer and only have academic experience with programming. We'll see what happens.

    I'm familiar with the term "netori" but generally don't like using it as it's often associated with more violent escapades and I try to use my own language to term things, but that is difficult at times it seems. I'll keep an eye on the project, if I am able, I may even contribute or donate someday. Depending on how things progress.
     
  20. TanukiCoast

    TanukiCoast New Member

    Joined:
    Today
    Wishlist:
    Skunk, poodle, and Otter tfs
    (Pleaseohpleaseohplease)
     
  21. Evildog

    Evildog New Member

    Joined:
    Today
    This is more of a quality of life thing, but I noticed that in any combat if your character's stats hit 0, such as health and whatever the blue bar is, you lose the combat. This is fine, but it doesn't take into account that you have party members. In other words, your party members and summons may still be functional and could win you the fight even if you are downed, but the fight instantly ends in defeat the moment you cannot participate in it. I found this to be kind of annoying, as it negates the purpose of drawing aggression to yourself because if you go down you lose, even if you still have a party. I feel that changing it in a way to where you only lose the fight if everyone is defeated makes more sense, but that is my opinion.

    As for content, I think that adding party members, even possibly familiars, and more summons would be interesting. Adding a lust demon summon to seduce your enemies could be cool, seeing as there already is a combat summon in the game.