I can't speak to earlier games as I was not involved. CoC2 is not TiTS or CoC.
No worries about games you weren't involved in, was speaking about those as well though
I can't speak to earlier games as I was not involved. CoC2 is not TiTS or CoC.
I for one can't wait for very vanilla, heterosexually monogamous relationships where I can sneak behind their backs and fuck the entire Frost Marches only to come to their smiling faces.
But I'd really enjoy it if we had some handholding. Specifically handholding orgies.
And the worms... as unpleseant as that particular episode was lolits only the cunt snakes, the hellhounds weren't feral.
For the record:
Don't try to be clever. We don't appreciate it. Don't try to Alinsky us with "make them live up to their own rules", especially if the rules were never ours in the first place.
Hi I'm the lead developer on this game. No feral shit, sorry.
Don't try to be clever. We don't appreciate it. Don't try to Alinsky us with "make them live up to their own rules", especially if the rules were never ours in the first place.
New Hi I'm the lead developer on this game. No feral shit, sorry.
trying to point out edge cases when someone says no is being clever, also the worms in coc are literal parasites, not feral worms...And the worms... as unpleseant as that particular episode was lol
Not trying to be clever, simply making the argument that that kinda thing was around in the other games, so it's confusing why it wouldn't be allowed here.
Wasn't asking for it, just trying to clarify the reasoning. Aye, aye cap'n!
Dragon waifu is completely sapient, but is only capable of communicating psionically. While this isn't an official stance to my knowledge, following the harkness test is typically the best means of determining what is acceptable to fuck in a Fengame.
You come off that way in this conversation because the other person on your side of the argument is doing things like comparing centaurs and minotaurs to beast content, continuing to bring it up after being told no, and trying to egg out responses. I don't think you're actively trying to trash talk anyone. specifically, parasites are allowed. its a case by case basis type thing. There is a lot more leeway for mythical creatures than there are for actual animals. that's why dragons are less of a gray area, and the frost wyrms are straight up an alien race, not an animal. I really doubt there will be feral dragon sex in coc2, unless its tiddy dragons. While concievably intelligent normal animals could exist, there wont ever be sex content with them in the games. It's not wrong to be into that kind of thing, but continuing to bring it up when multiple devs have said no is in bad taste.Sigh. I'm not trying to shame or insult anyone, just trying to understand what looks like a contradiction and grey area.
As far as the worms, no I suppose they aren't feral (whatever that actually is) but they are non-intelligent, non-humanoid animals which also happen to be parasites. (Btw are parasites allowed? Is that a thing?)
One could make a similar case with the upcoming dragon waifu in TiTS. I haven't looked at the doc so I dunno if there's going to be some sort of humanization that happens there, but at face value that's going to be an intelligent, non-humanoid animal essentially, so where is the line? That's all I'm trying to do here is find the line.
For example would werewolves be okay? Dragons? Chimera's?
trying to point out edge cases when someone says no is being clever,
and trying to egg out responses.
You come off that way in this conversation because the other person on your side of the argument is doing things like comparing centaurs and minotaurs to beast content, continuing to bring it up after being told no, and trying to egg out responses. I don't think you're actively trying to trash talk anyone. specifically, parasites are allowed. its a case by case basis type thing. There is a lot more leeway for mythical creatures than there are for actual animals. that's why dragons are less of a gray area, and the frost wyrms are straight up an alien race, not an animal. I really doubt there will be feral dragon sex in coc2, unless its tiddy dragons. While concievably intelligent normal animals could exist, there wont ever be sex content with them in the games. It's not wrong to be into that kind of thing, but continuing to bring it up when multiple devs have said no is in bad taste.
In CoC2, the females are highly regarded in drider society. They usually make up the bulk of a drider city's artisan population or a queen's court. It'd be a very odd or very rare occurrence to see one outside one of their nests.
That kind of thing with the only touch probably wouldnt be allowed. Because she wouldnt be able to give consent or really interact with the player at all.I apologize if I've come off as offensive or accusing. What I mean to do is be constructive and help define the borders of what is and isn't allowed in this new, sick ass game. So as far as the Patreon/legal side of the rules, it sounds like in most cases real animals are off the table even if they are sapient in some way, but as long as it's a mythical creature (and is sapient?) it's got a chance?
Like I was saying before, it seems like the ability to communicate is the big differenciating factor. So I wonder, then, what about a completely human woman who can't communicate? Say she's magical and she lives partially in another dimension and can't speak to you in any way except through touch. What would the stance towards that be?
I think setting out a definition of what feral means to the devs would be a helpful guideline here.
Also, let's not get into the semantics of being an animal versus being a race that looks exactly like an animal lol
That kind of thing with the only touch probably wouldnt be allowed. Because she wouldnt be able to give consent or really interact with the player at all.
Youve been reasonable the whole time, but the reason why there isnt a set of borders is because Feral already has a meaning that exists. Trying to gray it out is the problem here.
And then go back to just using the thread for discussion content we'd like versus have a discussion.
The Kiro and Kally stuff was done before the incest crackdown. It's kind of in a grey area because of it, and it might never get any additions due to it.
As far as I am aware, the BIG incest no-no is parent and child in any way, and there is no budging on that. As for incest between siblings...
I always got a vaguely incestuous vibe from the descriptions of the char birthing things like minotaurs, but maybe that was just my interpretation. And the rabbit girl mom and daughter? But I can't remember.
gwyn and garret are his kids
New Regarding discussing content you like, the "content you would like to see in the game" thread is not the place to discuss content that is banned in the games.
a coc flavored blood pool where you can bad end companions to the demons in exchange for power/buffs
Daughterfu content. I immensely enjoyed the 'breed it yourself' content of minotaur sons and Sophie's daughters of CoC, and the harpies of CoC 2 seem like a good fit for Champions who are no doubt breeding them left and right. As ambitious as followers are, if I had money to throw at the game I would probably try to get a harpy daughter follower whom attempts to romance and breed with the PC. Hrm... what's the growth rate for harpies?