It would require quite a lot of work and rework i imagine. Most of npc interaction dialogues need to be rewritten at least slightly. And considering game size i doubt they will add something like this any time soon. Same reason we probably won't get dzaan or bothrioc transformatives, which makes me kinda sad.
Actually, Steele getting psionics has been planned for years now. Points in favour of this (which have been in-game for a long time now) are:
Dzaan and bothrioc have addictive cum, which requires a lot of work to implement properly same as psionics. I'm well aware that those races are not psionic.
By 'misunderstanding', I actually meant I thought you were assuming that psionics were similar to their addictiveness in some regards. Psionics are not addictive, and I don't see how having psionic powers would affect Steele's interactions with others aside from combat moves and maybe variant scenes/options where those powers are utilised. The latter is completely optional and wouldn't apply to most scenes anyways, so I don't know why you think psyker Steele would take "a shitload of text for every character" to implement.Dzaan and bothrioc have addictive cum, which requires a lot of work to implement properly same as psionics. I'm well aware that those races are not psionic.
As for "planned for a long time", well i planned to get rich by the time i hit 30, and i'm still pretty far from that. You want it in game i do also but unless someone be willing to write a shitload of text for every character it's gonna work on i don't see it implemented in forseeable future. Use your heavy slut ray and pretend your steele is space magician
Why did you thought something like that? I mean there's literaly nothing in my post that even remotely states something similar. I even clarified what exacly i meant in next message.
That's the way fenoxo wanted it unless i'm mistaken.
Cause affecting only a couple npcs (which is what you're going to get from small amount of text alterations) would be really weak and lame for something as desired and epic as psionics are.
The reason we probably don't get dzaan or bothrioc TFs is because of the addictiveness associated with them; from there, I assumed that your comparison to those two races was because of said addictiveness which implied you thought psionics were addictive. I now see my assumption was wrong, and you meant the amount of work it would require to support each of them, regardless of why the rewrites are needed.
I've heard other people suggest a psionic class before, but IDK if Fenoxo is one of them. Even if he did originally plan for a psionic class, plans can change.
This seems more like something you personally want rather than something inherent with implementing psyker Steele; with the way you were talking, I assumed you were assuming it was the latter. Realistically speaking, I don't think most of Steele's interactions would benefit from using or otherwise mentioning their psionic powers. Then again, that would depend on what Steele's powers will be, none of which are confirmed. It's likely at least some of them will be arousing, as the psionic damage type affects Lust rather than HP (and the variant I mentioned before is clearly an arousing power); I don't think these powers will be widely used outside combat, though, as Steele is already charismatic enough to get into almost everyone's pants without them.
It literaly states the amount of work is the reason. You just refuse to actually get it it seems
They can, same with the
Look the whole discussion is pointless. From this point on it's pretty much obvious what i meant, i actually get your opinion too even if it's based on unimplemented stuff and desires.
And your opinion is the truth set in stone and not something that you personally want?
Now that's interesting.
It's not the first time I've missed something that should be obvious.It literaly states the amount of work is the reason. You just refuse to actually get it it seems
True. My current guess is that the devs were originally planning on adding psionics in some capacity, they just haven't done so because of some combination of:
I thought I was making clear distinctions, using phrases such as "I believe" and "I assumed", between things that are facts (to the best of my knowledge) and things that are my opinions. Or maybe it really was clear, and you're just poking a bit of fun at me. I'm not the best at identifying those kinds of things.And your opinion is the truth set in stone and not something that you personally want?
@Savin do you have anything to say on this matter?
) but maybe pregnancy content, Ardia impregnanting her beta Steele.
Not sure if transmasculine would be a thing in CoC2. With alchemy around there is no difficuly in changing ones sex and there would be no way to tell without including it in a character's backstory, which would make writing very awkward (it's commonplace, why bring it up?).
I think the idea was more about things like what are referred to as a "cuntboy." People who appear to be male/masculine and also have a pussy. Since there's a ton of characters who are feminine and have cocks, they seem to just be asking about an inverse.
Not into dudes personally, but from a symmetry point of view I would be open to seeing that same diversity reciprocated.
wait, does this mean we won't get any more Berwyn content/ finding his mistress?
Taking three doses of Galomax will make your hair, fluids and crotch gooey thus allowing you to adjust its size, type and even if you have anything there at all.
i always assumed that involved being goo which is different from what im thinkin of. you dont need to be made of goo to have a vagina or ass capable of taking centaur super dick... last i checked. maybe the upper limits of elasticity and other mods is a lot lower then i thought and its also possible that having a pussy that can fit a small child in it kinda creates hotdog-hallway situations i wouldn't really know as i just skim through the wiki to kinda guide me to the thing i want to do and in this case there would preferably be a distinct lack of being goo.
