Agreed. I would make a terrible liar. Once, I entered a Best Liar contest and came in 14th place. And there were only like 9 people in the contest.
Ah, the Lie-a-thon.
Maybe I am misunderstanding, but my male character is described as having tits. My character is a herm, so maybe that does something, but I think maybe it's just a size thing. Have you tried upping them to a B or greater (you can reload after) and see if it uses a different description?
Yeah, the game hides it well, but I did find it strange that you can be fat, but also flat-chested. That's not how bodies work.
I think the writers may just be overthinking some things. The point of Corruption IS to reduce characters to sex objects. They don't even need to have Talk options, just sex scenes on demand.
You're right but still, I think corruption is more than just that sometimes, for me corruption is something capable of changing the personality of the characters, molding them into a more exaggerated form of themselves or even changing what they were completely, both physically and mentally, it's true, many characters could be good just to use them and that's it, but I feel that making the corrupted routes just be dead ends is kind of boring, I would like to be able to make dominant characters have harems of secondary characters like Kalysea, or implicitly cause corruption of more characters or areas, like the spider woman from the area near the entrance to the mountain, or for example instilling that zo is assaulted by demons, imps or other corrupt beings and that leads to a corrupt zo or that the PC itself can corrupt her by its own hand, there are several characters that I would like treat them like the old style original COC...
I get what you're saying, there's lots to CoC1 that I'd like to see imported to CoC2 (including wholesale mechanics), but I disagree that making character just exaggerated forms of themselves is a compelling method to make players interested in corrupting some folks. For one, it still cedes narrative control to the writer rather than the player. Some players do chafe against that, regardless of how interesting the story is without considering interactivity. For another, making Corrupt characters more easily influenced by "player desire" means writers don't have to worry about disrupting "the canon" and write in whatever they want.
Being able to corrupt side characters in COC1 was a big draw for me, something Specific I'm hoping for is that we see Hirrud again and get to feminize him like what you can do with Kelt.
There is a bimbo Hirrud in the works from Garderford the last I heard.
Like the idea! I think, generally, being able to visibly impact the corruption/purity of other characters makes the corruption/purity of the PC much more palpable and gives players’ choice how to play their character more weight.
My gut instinct would think there's more leeway if he's already halfway there, so to speak, and just needs to finish the last step, if he wants to. The tradeoff of someone to be attracted to is a struggle we can relate to, basically. Porn as method of self-improvement. Crazy, I know.
Sorry, I do not quite understand what you are getting at with that first point.
Oh, I agree with that. I am more so confused as to what your answer related to Hirrud was getting at.
Yeah, that was all referring to your addendum for more FtM transformations. Trying to relate to being a guy with no dick, by presuming he wants one, you know?
I heard that in the Tychris expansion it's revealed that yoga (and the existence of dragons to a lesser extent) leads to the summoning of wraiths and was a factor in the start of the Wraith invasion (later called the Gods' War). It's a dangerous can of worms to open.
