Something tells me Feronia won't be leaving Khor'Minos any time soon, but she might give us some clothes as a reward post-siege.
What content would you like added?
- Thread starter Raindrops
- Start date
Agreed. I would make a terrible liar. Once, I entered a Best Liar contest and came in 14th place. And there were only like 9 people in the contest.
Trust me.
Probably unrelated, but most of them were carrying harps and such, not sure what that was about.
Ah, the Lie-a-thon.
I told the "wrong" direction to some guys who asked me, and then went in pretending I was a judge.
Good times.
The ability for the chest parser to use the feminine chest descriptors even if your gender is set as male.
It's weird that a Maximum Femboy character with 100% femininity, 0% tone, and 49% thickness still has their chest only described as "pectoral muscles". Even getting A-cups still uses "pectoral muscles".
It's weird that a Maximum Femboy character with 100% femininity, 0% tone, and 49% thickness still has their chest only described as "pectoral muscles". Even getting A-cups still uses "pectoral muscles".
Maybe I am misunderstanding, but my male character is described as having tits. My character is a herm, so maybe that does something, but I think maybe it's just a size thing. Have you tried upping them to a B or greater (you can reload after) and see if it uses a different description?
I want flat, and A-cup, male-identifying characters, with low or zero tone, to be able to use the feminine chest descriptors, instead of it always mentioning "pectoral muscles" and "pecs". Flat-chested female-identifying characters, with low or zero tone, do not have "pectoral muscles" or "pecs" in their appearance information. "Pectoral muscles" implies there's some visible muscle mass there, but flipping the gender option removes all mention of muscles.
Let guys have "girly, soft" chests.
The screenshot was to show that not even having breasts in the parser will override "pectoral muscles" in appearance information, unless the breasts are above a certain size.
As someone whose secondary character is made to sport moobs, I feel for this ._.
I don't know if anyone else has said this before, but it would be fun to be able to corrupt Marefok Valley in the future, in the sense of making it a corrupt city with some kind of mission line and making it like a version of Wayfort in the south. I know it would be repetitive, but it would be different in that it would allow corrupting characters in the southern area for those PCs that want to do so.
Yeah, the game hides it well, but I did find it strange that you can be fat, but also flat-chested. That's not how bodies work.
There's a minimum Belly stat in the game, already. If you have a Tone >30 and high Raw Belly Rating, there should be an A-cup minimum. Call it "fatty pectorals" if you like.
I think the writers may just be overthinking some things. The point of Corruption IS to reduce characters to sex objects. They don't even need to have Talk options, just sex scenes on demand.
You're right but still, I think corruption is more than just that sometimes, for me corruption is something capable of changing the personality of the characters, molding them into a more exaggerated form of themselves or even changing what they were completely, both physically and mentally, it's true, many characters could be good just to use them and that's it, but I feel that making the corrupted routes just be dead ends is kind of boring, I would like to be able to make dominant characters have harems of secondary characters like Kalysea, or implicitly cause corruption of more characters or areas, like the spider woman from the area near the entrance to the mountain, or for example instilling that zo is assaulted by demons, imps or other corrupt beings and that leads to a corrupt zo or that the PC itself can corrupt her by its own hand, there are several characters that I would like treat them like the old style original COC...
I get what you're saying, there's lots to CoC1 that I'd like to see imported to CoC2 (including wholesale mechanics), but I disagree that making character just exaggerated forms of themselves is a compelling method to make players interested in corrupting some folks. For one, it still cedes narrative control to the writer rather than the player. Some players do chafe against that, regardless of how interesting the story is without considering interactivity. For another, making Corrupt characters more easily influenced by "player desire" means writers don't have to worry about disrupting "the canon" and write in whatever they want.