Hmm. I was going to make a post, then I decided not to because I thought ThisIsMe was probably done complaining, but now I guess I will after all. Wall-of-text coming up:
@SierraLee: I'm another person who liked it in general. Like Number13, I was momentarily confused about the graphics not changing when switching to leather armor, but it's an understandable limitation. I enjoyed all the sex scenes I got on my play-through; however, I did feel like the game has relatively restricted "choice" in that regard, in the sense that I assume getting raped by orcs in the intro is mandatory (if it wasn't, I didn't manage to avoid it on my playthrough, even though I wasn't explicitly aiming for it) and if I remember correctly the game assumes that Sabia will want to have sex with the orc trainer if you beat him in training. Like I said, that's not a problem for me since I was into all of the pairings that came up in my game, but it seems like it might be a negative for someone who is more picky and has different tastes. (To a lesser extent, the whoring being a quick way to earn money also pushes the player in that direction, but I think it would be hard to remove that element without also removing the sense that Sabia as a character is being pushed in that direction by her circumstances, which is part of the appeal of the scenario I would think. It seems like it would be easier to add a check for whether the player wants Sabia to try to have sex with the training orc, or to abstain.) Or course, you can't make a sex game that has equal appeal to everyone, but if it's intended for it to be easy for Sabia to get into sexual situations without the player choosing it, it might make sense to give a bit more warning in the introductory post. I dunno, though, now that I think about it, if the orc gangbang is in fact unavoidable, that will probably give players enough warning near the start of the game about what kind of scenarios are possible.
The combat element seemed medium, although I'm not a good RPG player so there might be more to it than I noticed. The best strategy I could figure out was to consistently wait for two turns, then do crits on the third, but I may have missed a bunch of things. I wasn't sure whether to try to grind for money to buy training or not; I ended up doing it for some but not all of the training options.
The politics part was enjoyable but I had some trouble understanding what the consequences of my choices would be. For example, I was caught a bit off guard by having to decide whether or not to make a deal with one of the orc sub-chiefs before being able to talk to either of the other two (although maybe if I had been more attentive, I would have been able to decide which one I wanted to support before talking to any of them). I also wasn't quite sure whether things would start moving on automatically after a certain number of days, or if all of the game would wait for me on my own time, which kept me a bit off-balance in decision-making in general. While the game doesn't seem particularly punishing of "sub-optimal" choices, it doesn't feel as much like a real choice to me if I feel like I have to decide before I know what the decision is really about.
@ThisIsMe: as far as I can tell, your posts consist mainly of negative opinions derived in part from uncharitable assumptions based on the sample pics. As Number13 said, the absence of female orcs is a plot point, not a plot hole. That doesn't make this plot element immune to criticism, but your criticism would probably be taken more seriously if you had actually played the game.
@ThisIsMe and
@Kesil: what's so bad about otherwise human-looking green-skinned males with tusks? The game clearly seems to be focused on hetero sex, and the PC is female, so it makes good porn-logic that her potential partners would be male (and presumably the audience will be interested in male-on-female sex scenes). Green skin...well, I guess it's not really a big turn-on to most people, but it doesn't seem particularly unappealing either. I can see why someone would be "meh' about it. Tusks/big teeth seem reasonably popular in monster porn. Even if you feel like they're more vanilla-human than you would like, isn't it at worst about the same as ordinary humans?
@Kesil in particular: why should other people care about your monster-lore peeves? In general, I mean--I'm personally sympathetic to your naga peeve because I dislike getting linguistic stuff "wrong" (although isn't "female nagini" redundant? Also, wouldn't the plural be "naginis"? I don't think "nagini" is a plural form in Sanskrit and one of my pet peeves is unetymological use of invariant plurals in English) but it's not like any of this is real. It's all fictional and people have free license to do whatever. I put "wrong" in quotation marks because this stuff isn't objectively wrong, it's just something that some people find annoying, but evidently many others do not.
