What content would you like added?

[WolframL]

Quoting spoiler-tagged text works better if you don't cut off the end of the tag...

Like a conversation battle

Preeeeeety sure more of those will be coming, even if we don't know exactly when.

 

[Zackflame]

Quoting spoiler-tagged text works better if you don't cut off the end of the tag...

At this point you have to teach me how to use this forum.

 

[WhoAmI]

I got to thinking after completing the Winter Wolf quest for the nth time; and maybe someone else has thought of this, too. Knowing that Gweyr will not be sexable, and that Kasyrra can change her appearance, what if she appears before you in a dream in the form of Gweyr?

I can't remember correctly if there was/is an event that you could ask Kasyrra to take the form of someone.
Anyway, it's merely a thought I would share.

 

[WolframL]

I can't remember correctly if there was/is an event that you could ask Kasyrra to take the form of someone.

It's not quite like that but if you do the Temple of Sin event, Kas will offhandedly suggest that she could assume Cait's appearance if she wanted to, so the possibility is there at least. Savin has said there aren't any concrete plans for this, but that doesn't mean it can't happen at some point.

At this point you have to teach me how to use this forum.

You quoted my post, which has a spoiler tag in it. By cutting off the [/ISPOILER] at the end of it, you broke the tag which means that the text that is intended to be hidden became visible. Go edit your post and put that back at the end of the sentence and you'll see that it fixes the tag.

 

[Zackflame]

You quoted my post, which has a spoiler tag in it. By cutting off the [/ISPOILER] at the end of it, you broke the tag which means that the text that is intended to be hidden became visible. Go edit your post and put that back at the end of the sentence and you'll see that it fixes the tag.

I finally get it, thanks for teaching and being patience with me

 

[CitrusWolf]

is the mecian tf very far away? I remember it is Khorminos stuff but, where in the pipeline?

 

[Savin]

The only submitted mecian TF I am aware of is sitting in our Rejected pile.

 

[CitrusWolf]

The only submitted mecian TF I am aware of is sitting in our Rejected pile.

huh? well that's new I swore there was it somewhere that the mecian tf was going to be on khorminos for plot reasons or whatever must have been thinking of something else then

 

[Bast]

Tank stance Brienne/Brint

 

[Murloc Mazta]

Tank stance Brienne/Brint

Don't Brint/Brienne have their new(ish) arena set, which is a tank set?

 

[Aelana]

I would say its a control/debuff set. I think tanks are well supported with our companion. If Aroma, Tui...

 

[Murloc Mazta]

I would say its a control/debuff set. I think tanks are well supported with our companion. If Aroma, Tui...

Ah, my brain saw duelist stance and just immediately went "increases enmity? Oh, so its a tank set". I'm yet to actually test it, since I'm usually just using Winter Knight Brint.

 

[Adan]

player chastity
player chastity
player chastity

why only elf girl can have it

 

[Necros]

player chastity
player chastity
player chastity

why only elf girl can have it

If i remember correctly, too much work to account for that in every scene.

 

[Aelana]

player chastity
player chastity
player chastity

why only elf girl can have it

... What?

 

[Adan]

If i remember correctly, too much work to account for that in every scene.

I mean yes and no... I understand its too much work to give it a lot of focus. however:
the game can handle not having a specific genitalia already. So it could just ignore that genitalia in every case where there is no scene written for the chastity.
But I get what you are saying ,fully impletemnting it would be a lot of work. Im still hoping some writer is interested enough to give us that kind of content with a domme. Even if most of the other content doesnt react to it and simply disables content which would require a dick while the cage is on.

 

[Aelana]

Are you talking about having no genitalia? That was a concious, and IMO smart decision. As a writer, you have to assume something about the PC. Knowing that the Champion has a penis and/or vagina makes it a lot easier. Sure many scenes may work out of the box, but there are certainly some that won't make sense anymore. TiTS is the game that lets you create rather weird PCs, even if it breaks some scenes. CoC takes the other route. It will restrict the body of the PC such that it won't break scenes

 

[Necros]

Are you talking about having no genitalia? That was a concious, and IMO smart decision. As a writer, you have to assume something about the PC. Knowing that the Champion has a penis and/or vagina makes it a lot easier. Sure many scenes may work out of the box, but there are certainly some that won't make sense anymore. TiTS is the game that lets you create rather weird PCs, even if it breaks some scenes. CoC takes the other route. It will restrict the body of the PC such that it won't break scenes

I think they are talking about chastity cage(is that whats it called) like Ryn has.

 

[AStrangeGeek]

I think they are talking about chastity cage(is that whats it called) like Ryn has.

Yes, but the point still stands. It would have to be accounted for in every sex scene, which is too much work.

 

[Adan]

I was talking about chastity, but it could break the game because using your genitalia is mentioned in thousands of scenes. So my simplest solution is, when the chastity is on, make the game handle it as if the player did not have a genitalia to avoid contradictions. But its not perfect. Now that I think about it anal/oral scenes sometimes still include reference to the genitalia which is not used for the act. -getting erect or being touched... so at some places it would not be ideal to implement it ignoring existing scenes.
not to mention the more places its accounted for in text the better the experience so... lot of work but that is not a problem is a writer is super into it. But I dunno who that writer would be

 

[The Observer]

as if the player did not have a genitalia

This is a complete non-starter.

 

[Adan]

This is a complete non-starter.

because?

to expand on it a bit: chastity cage is its own genitalia, in place of a dick. cCage: yes = dick : no.

 

[AStrangeGeek]

because?

Well, it is a porn game after all ...

 

[The Observer]

You'd know if you'd read the publicly available writer's guide.

I've learned my lesson after writing for several transformation-heavy games now. As with all things, the point to consider is that "if we can't do it well, we shouldn't do it." To that end:

• The PC will always have a sex of some sort. No genderless. If an item proc would leave you with no sex, either that TF will not proc or the character will refuse to use the item at all.
• The PC will always have some clothing on, and be equipped with a weapon.
• The PC will always be bipedal, with their primary genitalia in the forward crotchal region. This means no centaurs/nagas.

These can all be done away with in end-game scenarios (eg. Bad Ends), but otherwise the above are hard and fast rules. We've proven that doing otherwise results in a sub-optimal experience for both writers and players, as much as some may try to argue otherwise.

The presence of tail genitals, fuckable breasts, and multiple cocks should be considered. Support is appreciated, but not necessary. There will not be multiple vaginas, nor wombs to go along with them.

 

[Adan]

There is a musinderstanding here, at the very least with Geek, not sure if it stand with Observer.
I did not mean to make the player actually genderless, as in, say it in the game.
I was just brainstorming about how to implement it in the code. If the code makes a distinction between having a dick and not having one, in order to prevent scenes from triggering which assume your dick is free when its not, the dick option should be taken away. That is all I meant, not that anywhere ingame you would be genderless.

edit: (in fact it would be essential to fork it in a way so that the game still can tell your original gender, so all im saying, there is a mechanism already in place which could be used somehow to avoid scenes that dont fit with chastity)

 

[The Observer]

It's the same reason why we aren't letting you have a chastity cage. You're functionally sexless. Ryn is an extremely special case and because of that cannot use generic companion scenes and needs to have the chaste tag to block any generic sexual activity.

You might be able to have one as part of a scene, but it needs to come off at the end of it. No walking around with one.

 

[Tide Hunter]

player chastity
player chastity
player chastity

why only elf girl can have it

I mean yes and no... I understand its too much work to give it a lot of focus. however:
the game can handle not having a specific genitalia already. So it could just ignore that genitalia in every case where there is no scene written for the chastity.
But I get what you are saying ,fully impletemnting it would be a lot of work. Im still hoping some writer is interested enough to give us that kind of content with a domme. Even if most of the other content doesnt react to it and simply disables content which would require a dick while the cage is on.

When Ryn was added into the game, she broke a load of scenes where companions were mentioned due to her having a chastity cage. While a scene cage would work, permanently attaching/equipping one would also likely break scenes.

 

[WolframL]

Player chastity cages/belts can work in one-off scenes like the one Wsan already wrote for Evelyn and smol penis Champs, or the Bad End with Sandre and Caera. It doesn't work for the Champ on an ongoing basis for reasons already mentioned, isn't happening in this game and is in fact never happening.

 

[Adan]

Player chastity cages can work in one-off scenes like the one Wsan already wrote for Evelyn and smol penis Champs, or the Bad End with Sandre and Caera. It doesn't work for the Champ on an ongoing basis for reasons already mentioned, isn't happening in this game and is in fact never happening.

I swear Im not trying to annoy anyone but I have to react to Savin here...
You dont HAVE to have the writers handle it. Every problem has multiple solutions.
Cage can be auto-taken off with a single line of text before every bad end. Transformations could be flat out prevented with a single line of text while its worn.
I could go on because we havent really talked about all the specific problems walking around with cage (or any toy) would bring.
There ARE solutions, but its either too much work, or if simple to implement then arguably too restrictive.
I would argue that restrictive (blocking lots of content) is fine, since toys dont have to be pernament.

I dont think I was completely understood before but its kinda my fault for starting off with a generic counter argument to what I assumed would be raised later on. But now the circle is complete. Coding CAN take care of things so that all the writers can go on not caring about chastity in their texts.

 

[WolframL]

I think you are vastly underestimating the work this would entail. If you have a cage/belt then you're requiring every sex scene (and any other time the Champ's genitals/underwear are mentioned because it might be relevant there) to account for the possibility that they're wearing one and to write parser checks and alternate text for it. Alternatively, you'd need some sort of check that tells the game 'this content can't proc because it doesn't support chastity' which would still mean going back to every scene, determining if it should be prevented and writing in a check for it. And what happens to those scenes where you have no possible sex content due to no available options because, again, a fundamental assumption of the game is that the Champ will always have some sort of accessible genitals?

The issue with Ryn is very real and the reason that she's completely blocked from generic sex scenes is because her cage broke the parser system.