... Unsure if heavy sarcasm or pure innocence...
It is not drivable.
... Unsure if heavy sarcasm or pure innocence...
It is not drivable.
but it probably is ridable... unless the tank rides you. :laugh:
- http://wiki.smutosaur.us/Semith
The other two aren't bad ideas at all. I'd be amazed if Savin didn't do the third one at some point, even if only as a quest event.
My giant scorpion idea is for a non sentient mob along the lines of cuntsnakes or cockvines. If you are defeated in battle they fuck you mercilessly with their "stingers" maybe an animal native to Vulcrim.
"Higher" zooerastia is not allowed on Fengames. You can use and kill little critters, but that's apparently okay.
Cuntsnakes and cockvines get around it because they're sorta kinda controlled by the PC.
Except you're not controlling the cuntsnake when you defeat it then use it as a glorified condom
@Dongstar doesn't matter what classification the animal is, if Fen thinks it's bestiality then it's a no go.
Except you're not controlling the cuntsnake when you defeat it then use it as a glorified condom
@Dongstar doesn't matter what classification the animal is, if Fen thinks it's bestiality then it's a no go.
Cuntsnakes and cockvines get around it because they're sorta kinda controlled by the PC. Honestly I don't see what the fuss is about where we all have to tiptoe around it; there are way worse things in smut. But still, just make him a dude with an exoskeleton and a stinger and it'll be fine.
The thing with the current "non-sapient" sexual encounters (which, to my knowledge, only include cunt snakes, cockvines, and mimbranes), is that the creatures are just living genitals with the barest traits of actual animals attached.
Cunt snakes are cumvores (which is an absurd premise in and of itself) and the vast majority of their bodies are just long vaginas. The only reason they have a "mouth" is to subdue would-be hosts and to bite their ass and become a cunt tail. They also don't actually have eyes, but Chesh's bust is a little misleading. They're a hose with a vagina at one end and a means of attaching themselves to asses on the other. That's it. A living onahole.
Cockvines are literally just dick tentacles growing out of a bush. They're dicks that move on their own.
Mimbranes are also cumvores, and they're like... napkins. They're like flying napkins or something. Maybe they're supposed to be jizz rags. And you don't even have "sex" with mimbranes because they don't have genitals. They just absorb sex fluids and reproduce asexually.
There's a leap between these absurdist symbiote/parasite designs and creatures that have some nonsensical sexual trait stapled to them but are otherwise traditional or functional animals. Scorpions with dick-stingers are reached via said leap.
That's really where the division lies, I think. If something is just an animate sex organ/masturbatory aid (as all current non-sapients in TiTS are) it's fine. As soon as it becomes a creature with any facet to its existence other than "inter-species sex as its sole reason for existence," it's probably no longer acceptable unless it maintains a level of sapience and self-awareness that would allow it to consent.
Yup. Because tentacle monsters are still basically just masses of animate penises. Intelligent or no, it's still just a bunch of dicks. It's not a creature with a bunch of tentacle dicks, it's only a bunch of tentacle dicks. In both TiTS and CoC, they're attached to a bush.
I imagine if someone were to come up with some kind of creature, let's say a frog with a bunch of tentacles or something, it wouldn't be acceptable. Because then it's not about tentacle dicks fucking the PC, but about a frog fucking the PC with tentacle dicks.
Again, this seems pretty clear-cut to me. I don't know why everyone makes such a fuss about trying to pinpoint some kind of specific justification for it.
As soon as it becomes a creature with any facet to its existence other than "inter-species sex as its sole reason for existence," it's probably no longer acceptable unless it maintains a level of sapience and self-awareness that would allow it to consent.
Yup. Because tentacle monsters are still basically just masses of animate penises. Intelligent or no, it's still just a bunch of dicks. It's not a creature with a bunch of tentacle dicks, it's only a bunch of tentacle dicks. In both TiTS and CoC, they're attached to a bush.
Again, this seems pretty clear-cut to me. I don't know why everyone makes such a fuss about trying to pinpoint some kind of specific justification for it.
What if there were dogs and when they barked they shot bees at you, and instead of stings the bees had dicks
That would never work.
Or it will irritate people and make them dig into their position even harder simply out of spite. Which this always does. Always.
I'm assuming this is where we dump our crap ideas
A poison from a drider or a lamia that slowly turns you into one if you don't get it cured at a doctor.
SSTDs were part of TiTS' advertising campaign. Will we ever see them in any shape? I'm afraid the answer's "no".