Here's the gist of it.
For questions/suggestions, please reply to this thread, in order to keep the document clean.
For questions/suggestions, please reply to this thread, in order to keep the document clean.
Last edited:
Do you mean Faux Cow though ? Iirc that's the actual name of the variant, bc it makes guys into "pseudo cows"
Edit: Also, out of curiosity, why did you make it increase looseness?
Oh okay That's fairYup, but I'm avoiding the 'cow' word because it hurts my fragile masculine sensibilities lololol
I mean, I can be a complete butt slut and still be a boy, right?
Why not increase anal wetness instead? (be careful bc the scale is much smaller than the other traits though, I think 5 is like gushing lube 24/7)Because it adds up to the sluttiness factor, but on second thought maybe some people would prefer to remain 'tight', so I think I'll remove the looseness thing.
Why not increase anal wetness instead?
I think the current version pushes the ass/bubble butt transformative too hard. Can it be toned down, to make it easier to avoid bubble butt (if so inclined). Also, perhaps add an antirequisite for buns of steel or ass slap patch.
To be frank, i really hate that "Easy" is on this. But, since there is no version of "treated readiness", there isn't a net loss of lust capacity, so take i'll the bad with the good.
Still worth doing until Fen says whether it's okay or not, imhoJust so you know this probably won't be accepted due to how Fen wants to write his own variant in the future. It's a good idea to get the ball rolling, but it's safe to not expect much out of your submission.
Just so you know this probably won't be accepted due to how Fen wants to write his own variant in the future. It's a good idea to get the ball rolling, but it's safe to not expect much out of your submission.
A bit of good news, though: an excellently written “Faux Cow” path for the treatment sailed right through my review with flying colors. I’m honestly not convinced I could do it better.
If you do, I highly recommend matching the code in treatment.as if you can. That way the consistency will match and it will be less of a headache to sort through when bug fixing. Otherwise, instead of coding it yourself, just let me know when the text is ready and I'll try to to get it coded as soon as I am able to.because Friday I'll start coding it
This argument certainly has merit, but it should also be noted that the Treatment operates under it's own parameters. I believe OP did a fair job by using inhuman desire and easy, which is comparable but also contrasts existing treatment paths.As far as the new mechanics, the "Innocent Allure" perk is doable, but I am iffy about it since it has more benefits attached to it than drawbacks. Combat-oriented perks that are derived outside of the character class (especially through transformations), should probably not have a dramatic upper hand in combat. I'm not sure what to suggest for re-balancing it though. Cosmetic and non-combat perks usually are fine however since they will not dictate the combat gameplay meta.
If you're quick it might get added into the public ensuring i can get the treatment done rather quickly(If anyone still has any suggestions, now is the last chance, because Friday I'll start coding it)
If you're quick it might get added into the public ensuring i can get the treatment done on the wiki in june rather rather than july
As far as the new mechanics, the "Innocent Allure" perk is doable, but I am iffy about it since it has more benefits attached to it than drawbacks.
If you do, I highly recommend matching the code in treatment.as if you can.
I would say add a scene to ass-slap that can remove bubble butt (maybe talk with Foxxling about it). Additionally, consider having innocent allure require permacute.
Perhaps it should come with a penalty to physique gain, or a temporary defense penalty when teasing? Since it offers a boost to evasion, I should think it would work better for smugglers, anyways, so it would add some risk vs. reward.
If so, then that is fine. I just thought I'd bring it up since I have a feeling it may change over time, especially if it becomes over powered, but I could be wrong of course. However, I can tell that this perk will have some per-use limitations--as in the perk's effects will most likely fail for opponents that are lust immune, stun immune, or otherwise disables the ability to flee (if trying to use it to flee from combat) so that could be a good enough balance for it. You don't have to change it right away though and it can still be implemented as you have it outlined.Fen seems to be okay with how the perk is now, after we made some changes from the first version, so I guess it should be fine?
Please don't. Innocent Allure seems (to me) to be perfect for twink/ trapish characters while Perma-cute locks masculinity to max effectively blocking the PC from accessing any of the trap or twink specific scenes.As for Innocent Allure requiring Perma-cute... Yeah, that does make sense. I'll weigh the merits and drawbacks.
Please don't. Innocent Allure seems (to me) to be perfect for twink/ trapish characters while Perma-cute locks masculinity to max effectively blocking the PC from accessing any of the trap or twink specific scenes.