Search results

Still bored.

If "a social experiment" a euphemism for "trolling"... Yep, this character is made exclusively for this.

It is not a nice thing to make such characters. Because it is made to insult players and the author does not even trying to hide it. Bored, not bothered.

I think the right form of the word is "assumably" or "assumedly".

I'd say 5000-10000.

Another plot-armored asshole.

Inessa or Lerris. Inessa's author left us, so you don't need a permission. It is a pretty generic item, so fitting it in should not be any problem.

Dove Balm is a targeted transformative. It only grants wings. AS is racial transformative. Wings are only one of its features. Also, dove and avian wings are not exactly the same. Similar, but not same.

Well, it is a bit vague, but was intended to be classic version of avian arms. Like here: https://e621.net/post/show/962544/ Sorry, nope. Not a functional wings, at least. And not without humanoid hands. But if you remove "paws" flag from hands with save editor, description would be changed to...

Not accessory slot, that's for sure. A flag would suffice. Or piercing slot. Dirty, but not too invasive. Status effect would have an integrity problem: what if you lose target cock? Or should ring also act as blocking effect? But what if something would ignore blocked status? So it should be...

Hm... Cockring? Upon use, select cock to wear it and shrinking factor. Can be removed from default inventory/interact. Not too difficult, actually.

Well, you've got "furry" part right, at least :rolleyes: Sentient non-anthros are fine too. Though dedicated arms are sort of mandatory for efficient interaction with the world.

There are arguments. You are just ignoring them.

Some people just can't settle with one choice. Though non-goo shapeshifting would be better.

Does not compute. Superior taste means furries; monster girls are for weaklings who can't free their minds from the shackles of humanity.

And this is the problem's summary. That's exactly what we are saying. You offer it - you write it. That's what I'm saying when I'm saying that you have no idea how it works and yet making assumptions. This is what a TF is. A scene which describes how someone or something doing something with...

Then you should describe it better.

Because if the "write it yourself" rule. And the "I don't know how it works, but I'm sure it is simple" attitude.

Is there a list of permable perks anywhere?

I don't have the source. So it stuck in limbo for now.