You know with enought inner studborness one can by copypasting been be not worst writer than decent one. I get you re more fan of writers so at least not try make at the same time coders looks bad
The difference between a good and a poor coder is that the good coder ends up copy/pasting
himself. 90% of the problems encountered can be broken down to the same, recurring 10% sub-problems. Once you know how to break down a problem properly, well done, you are officially a programmer and you'll do things that work, without any experience (just basic knowledge). No one will ever notice that you code is crappy if it is.
If you are a writer, you can learn the theory and how stories are generally written but ultimately you still need to practice (through writing exercises or a lot of reading) a lot if you want to write something that's enjoyable to read. You can't "google" your story like you can "google" your code problems
edit: btw, I'm not saying that Programmers are inferior to writers, only that's it's easier to learn how to code than it is to learn how to write.