Please don't take this the wrong way man, but you are a MASSIVE dickhead. I've been lurking the forum for only a couple days but I've never seen a person so far up their own ass that I had to make this account.
Why, thank you.
Oh and best believe I'll be back in this thread to post a scathing review if that shit is anywhere below a 5/10.
The "scathing review" of someone who has made clear they're disinclined to give the content a fair shake and their intentions to write a hit piece has nil worth to me, but you're more than welcome to do so. It'll be about as effective at changing minds as a political op-ed in a newsrag, written for those who already believe that way, but them's the breaks.
I just discovered I'm very passionate about calling smug hacks out on internet forums.
It was a joke, I fully meant to raise his hackles with my post.
I mean, given your open statements right there, how you've conducted yourself since you've stepped in, your interactions with the other posters, and your focus not on what was said but the tone with which it was said, I can draw my own conclusions.
You're not here to discuss the content, you're here to try and punish me for what you perceive as my jackassery, and any informational content to be had is incidental to that goal. The victory condition here, for lack of a better term, isn't to come to a synthesis of ideas based on the facts at hand, but to make me feel bad. Which is cool; rhetoric is what most people speak, which means they only change their minds after sufficient emotional pain/dissonance is inflicted, and dialectic is often most effective when applied with rhetoric; conversely, the best rhetoric is rooted in the truth, even when it more often than not isn't. However, since you've all but declared your intentions out in the open, I'll just quietly and calmly ignore you since there's unlikely to be anything genuinely useful to be had there.
I expect a full denial of your motives and a sarcastic question as to whether I can read your mind. Either way, I'm not going to reply to you; surprisingly, despite my earlier so-called "chimp-out", I can exercise emotional continence when I'd like to and not absolutely need to have the last word.
But instead the author took bits and pieces of my statements to force their own narrative onto it.
Ah yes, "I was taken out of context".
And it was just coincidental that every example of player agency you gave involved making people pay for opposing you.
Come on, I'm not stupid.
Since the hyper aggressive responses, personal attacks, and wanton hostilely continues I'll leave this be.
Reverse victim offender. Shocked, shocked that when you came in and tried to make a discussion out of not the content, but an F95/Chan caricature you get the exact same response as if you'd wandered in and said "the game is absolutely overrun with futa furries", "Savin/Fen rolls on his $25k/30k a month in his Scrooge McDuck money bin" or "Cait cucks you, ree, what is with Savin and his I AM A BIG STINKY BRAIN fetish".
Have a good day, all of you; I'm done here for now. Miko and Mai won't write themselves.
