...So no one else is saying it, huh?
"That feel when you accuse OP of illiteracy" The subject of this sentence is the group that accused OP of being illiterate.
"When you yourself are illiterate" This part of the sentence is referring to the fact that the people who barked at OP for not reading didn't read the original post.
Savin wasn't attacking the OP. He was making fun of the people who did, since they did the very thing they were making fun of. He quoted OP because he was agreeing with the sentence he quoted. Wishing OP good luck wasn't sarcasm. It was genuine.
You literally read the exact opposite of what he read. Which is, considering that the subject is reading comprehension, bloody hilarious.
This thread is gold.
That sure isn't how it reads to me, why would you reply in that way to a person you agree with instead of saying something along the lines of "I feel you there," or the like? It makes zero sense. If you're going to say that sort of thing you quote the people that you're mocking, not the person you're agreeing with. It's the text equivalent of looking someone straight in the eyes while facing them before you start talking to a whole other person or group of people without facing away from the person you're looking at. To say that people are going to be confused that you aren't talking to the person you're looking at is a most definite understatement.
On that note, however, neither of the people OP was responding to were saying anything about OP being illiterate, hell they barely even suggest that OP didn't read fully. They do, but they definitely don't come out and say it.
I'm not sure when accusing someone of being illiterate became an acceptable way to say that they lazy-read something, yet whenever it became such it should have stayed okay back then and not continued being so.
