Apologies in advance for the wall of text.
For the record, I disagree with the belief that we don't have a right to know what the truth of this situation. "None of your business" is just the claim of someone who has something to hide, frequently because they engaged in wrongdoing which they wish to hide. It's always better to have more knowledge about every side of what's happened.
The notion that one is automatically guilty if they don't say anything on the matter is an assumption derived from opinion - you cannot definitively say that in all cases - and if you jump to conclusions then you're not helping the matter in any case.
And whilst it can be said to be better "to have more knowledge about every side of what's happened", that doesn't mean you're entitled to it nor will even get it.
Therefore it can be argued to be better to just substantiate your opinion with what facts are provided and move on with your life (i.e. not really warranting a response even) - even if you disagree with a certain person / stance.
I'm not looking for drama; I'm interested only in knowledge. People's feelings are not a justification for leaving the world's people ignorant of anything that would be beneficial for them to understand.
Whilst your interest in knowledge about this matter is noteworthy, it also doesn't immediately allow for / result in you being deserving of / entitled to that knowledge.
The same could be said if two of your friends had an argument which you were aware of - you don't automatically have the right to know everything about it - only if either party wishes for you to be involved (although even then if you're only getting one side of the story you're not entitled to the full picture).
In most cases the only reason why companies / individuals put out a statement is for PR - they're not always obligated to do so - even if one party has gone public. Privacy is a thing, ya know.
Judge not, lest ye be judged....
Kinda ironic ngl. Previously seemingly implying that Savin and Co. have something to hide because of their silence on the matter... but you're better than that, right?
It is the principle of the thing. Keeping secrets is ALWAYS wrongful behavior; if you give yourself permission to hide relevant facts from people who deserve to know, then it doesn't matter whether the harm so caused is great or small; even the smallest of infractions will open the door to greater and greater transgressions, and the slope will never get less slippery the lower you allow yourself to slide down it.
As others have pointed out this is probably the worst take of the lot.
I won't pretend to have knowledge of your background with regards to secrets, but assuming that it's always wrongful behavior doesn't account for the motives of said secrecy nor the results of said secrecy (both of which - the motives and results - can be good or bad - depending on your stance as well as their objective outcomes).
The fact of the matter is there was a situation, it has assumedly been handled privately (well one party went public, but I assume you get what I mean) - and whilst we don't know all the facts - it doesn't mean we're entitled to them.
I myself am in disagreement with how things went down - but I'm not pretending to know the full picture, hence why I've reserved judgement - not using the lack of information provided as ammunition for allegations.
I cannot force anyone to do the right thing, but I'm certainly going to make sure that they know it's wrong, not in my opinion, not in any sense of moral relativism, but in absolute unquestionable fact.
See, this is the problem when debating morals. "The right thing" is subjective depending on your stance (bias / opinion) - and in large part assuming the moral high ground doesn't always work out, because morality tends to operate in an idealistic realm / case - and thus is not often found in realistic cases, such as day to day life.
Ethics on the other hand, can be used to a much better effect for that (determining guilt or lack thereof), since it's not coming from a biased / subjective viewpoint.
To conclude, be careful where you are standing, the high ground can be deceiving.
