Search results

So then that'd mean no new NPC shops at all then, unless they were a subsidiary of a big company? No more NPCs that run their own little TF shops and the like?

You just want more art of Fisi without having to commission. :p

It could also just be an independent gun range that sells guns that already exist. You know, like how it is in real life.

Wait for Xpac.

Some time between not now and never.

You enter actual functions from the source code. A lot of them require arguments to work correctly too. I'm on mobile right now so I can't look up which one to call specifically tho.

I think the rationale is like, since DP scenes are already so rare they don't want to further restrict access to them. It'd be like writing a taur scene and then setting a cock size limit.

I don't remember, and I don't remember which scene it was either. I just saw it in passing while learning dick code.

Like Avery said it's all in the code on GitHub, but I wouldn't recommend that route as it's not easy to read the text at all. Reading gdocs from the implemented section is probably the way to go, but of course you won't find all scenes there.

I'm thinking you're like a host to a bunch of parasites and can "wield" them. I don't know if any of you have played Rance 6, but like Caloria Cricket but parasites instead of just insects.

Yes, it's possible. No one is going to flesh out the mechanics or write any of it though, so it won't ever happen.

I'm not 100% sure for every scene, but all the ones I've looked at code for and coded myself do. Usually they use the function cockThatFits which says it "Finds the biggest cock that fits inside a given value" if there are size restrictions, and they just use the parsers [pc.cockBiggest] and...

Nice bed.

Elasticity, wetness, and tightness are the main determinants of vaginal capacity. There's a couple other flags that can increase capacity too. Being a taur also adds a LOT of capacity.

The current parser tag system is a tool for writers, not for coders. When there are say 1000 possible different cock descriptions, it makes it so they don't have to write variations for all 1000 themselves, they can just do [pc.cock x]. It's about saving writers' time while still making their...

Two problems I see with the parser solution: Having to manually set variables and define functions to use it isn't any less work than an if/else block- although I will say it looks cleaner and is easier to read so long as you know what the function/variable do. And here's the big one, the...

Case by case basis. Generally though it is a volume measurement however different NPCs can fit different volumes in their cooters. This means you can't just say "have under a 14in cock" as it is also dependent on girth. The volume calculation is also fairly complex and depends on what kind of...

"UVGR_CLIMB_ATTEMPTED" needs to be undefined "UVGR_SAVICITE_IDOL" needs to be undefined

It's a hassle, inconvenient, not worth the time, etc. No one ever said it was difficult. This is a concept you came up with on your own, and it really seems like you're trying to come off as intelligent by refuting it's difficulty or coming to help all the poor coding peons that make TiTS. If...

It's not that it's hard, it's that it is very tedious because of all the variations. "Codemonster" or "nightmare to code" doesn't mean it requires some sort of intermediate programming knowledge, just that it takes twice as long or more to implement what is effectively the same amount of...