A lot of questions about Wyld Wine - [Dismissed]

[Undecided]

EDIT: Dismissed upon clarification from Balaknightfang & Leykoss.

----------------

Alright, so to preface this - all I'm going to say is apologies in advance for the lengthy post. If there needs to be any additional saves supplied - I have them.

*NB due to the Wyld Elf character creation not having the Horse Cock Wyld Mark currently, all of the below takes into consideration that the champions starting race is not Wyld Elf. If in the future the Horse Cock Wyld Mark is added to the character creation - then the below considerations should apply as well.*


1) Firstly, is it intended that female champions can grow an 8 inch horse cock (from Wyld Wine's Horse Cock Wyld Mark), but male champions can potentially only have a 6.5 inch horse cock?

• One would think that the cock sizes would be the same - but a female champion can grow an 8 inch horse cock (which replaces their vagina) even without the [Hung] perk, whereas male champions need the [Hung] perk just to reach 6.5 inches via the cock growth TF of Wyld Wine (and by extent will then only have a 6.5 inch horse cock with the Horse Cock Wyld Mark).

Spoiler: 1)

2) Secondly, is it intended that the 8 inch horse cock (from Wyld Wine's Horse Cock Wyld Mark) that female champions grow (which replaces their vagina) does not come with a pair of balls?

• The female champion will be referred to as a shemale, but will lack testicles.

Spoiler: 2)

3) Thirdly, is it intended that the 8 inch horse cock (from Wyld Wine's Horse Cock Wyld Mark) that female champions grow is not affected by the [Hung] perk?

• For that matter - one would assume that there would be consistency between the male and female champions cock growth for the Horse Cock Wyld Mark. Potentially when the horse cock TF happens its default length for both male and female champions could be 8 inches - with champions growing a 10 inch horse cock if they have the [Hung] perk.

Spoiler: 3)

4) Fourthly, is it intended that the Horse Cock Wyld Mark prevents the normal cock growth TF from Wyld Wine from occurring?

• So, for instance, if your champion has a cock under 6.5 inches with the [Hung] perk or under 5 inches without the [Hung] perk, but they roll the Horse Cock Wyld Mark - they will grow a horse cock, and their cock will not be subject to further growth TFs from the Wyld Wine.
  
• I assume this is due to the conditional checks at the beginning when you take the Wyld Wine in its "raw" state have already been met (going by the Wiki at least).
• See below, images of a champion who did not have the hung perk - they should of had a cock growth TF to result in a 5 inch cock, but the TF was overriden by the Horse Cock Wyld Mark check.
  • If needed I have a save for this character, with additional Wyld Wines in the inventory - so if one needs to test if they have any effect just let me know. On my end - they have no effect.

Spoiler: 4)

Anyways, as mentioned before - apologies for the lengthy post on this. Please let me know if any saves are required - I'll post them seperately under this thread as needed.

Additionally - if any of content within these questions are outright bugs, then you can forward this thread to the Bug Reports forum, and I'll edit the title as needed.

 

[Undecided]

*bump*


(done under the advisement of a mod - apologies to bring attention to this thread in this fashion - but I'm just unsure of how else to bring attention to this, aside from my signature of course).

 

[Paradox01]

What's with the [Reply Pending] tag in the thread title? Did you write that or did one of the Mods?

 

[Undecided]

What's with the [Reply Pending] tag in the thread title? Did you write that or did one of the Mods?

I do so on my Question & Answers and Bug Report threads, not to indicate snark or anything, more to make it easier for anyone scrolling through the list of questions / bug reports to identify what has been addressed and what hasn't.

When a writer / dev (or anyone who can address the question / bug) replies, I then change it to [Answered] (for Questions & Answers) and [Resolved] (for Bug Reports).

 

[Paradox01]

I do so, not to indicate snark or anything, more to make it easier for anyone scrolling through the list of questions / bug reports to identify what has been answered and what hasn't.

When a writer / dev (or anyone who can address the question / bug) replies I change it to [Answered].

Well no wonder no one's answered. Between that and your sig, it comes across as immensely arrogant and underhanded. "I shall advertise to the world the status of my query; ignore it at your peril, Developers!" If I were one of the Mods, I wouldn't reply out of sheer stubbornness and a refusal to be held accountable to some rando schmuck who thinks he's entitled to an answer.

You know what's a good indicator that something's been answered or not?



Until I posted here, you had ZERO replies and 671 views. That wide a ratio might be an indicator that people don't want to try and answer your question for one reason or another. If this happens, be a man and move on. Maybe tone down future questions just a bit so people don't feel like they're responding to a Master's Thesis in physics.

Just trying to help.

 

[Undecided]

Well no wonder no one's answered. Between that and your sig, it comes across as immensely arrogant and underhanded. "I shall advertise to the world the status of my query; ignore it at your peril, Developers!" If I were one of the Mods, I wouldn't reply out of sheer stubbornness and a refusal to be held accountable to some rando shmuck who thinks he's entitled to an answer.

You know what's a good indicator that something's been answered or not?

View attachment 16344

Until I posted here, you had ZERO replies and 671 views. That wide a ratio might be an indicator that people don't want to try and answer your question for one reason or another. If this happens, be a man and move on. Maybe tone down future questions just a bit so people don't feel like they're responding to a Master's Thesis in physics.

Just trying to help.

Thanks for your feedback. If that's your impression, then I'm sorry, that wasn't intentional.

As I've said before, I'm comprehensive with the majority of what I post, with the hope that I can be as clear as possible - to avoid a lot of confusion. I realize that this may not always be the best approach, sorry about that.

As for your last point - so, I'm supposed to not bring to light potential issues, if they aren't addressed (and by extent then accept that they'll most likely always be in-game until someone else reports it)? Okay, my bad, sorry about that.

Once again, apologies that my efforts are inefficient and have issues. I do appreciate your feedback though - I'll try to present my posts as non-entitled as possible.

 

[Paradox01]

If that's your impression, then I'm sorry, that wasn't intentional.

*sigh* You don't owe me an apology. No one owes anyone shit. That's my point. The sooner people realize they aren't entitled to shit in this world, the better off we'll all be.

As I've said before, I'm comprehensive with the majority of what I post, with the hope that I can be as clear as possible - to avoid a lot of confusion. I realize that this may not always be the best approach, but hey - I'm trying my best.

Being clear is half the battle; concise is the flip-side of that coin.

As for your last point - so, I'm supposed to not bring to light potential issues, if they aren't addressed (and by extent then accept that they'll most likely always be in-game until someone else reports it)? Okay, my bad, sorry about that.

Dude, that's not what I said. This thread would have been better off the Bug Reports forum. If it's such a technical issue, it's better off aimed at the Devs instead of here in the Q&A subforum. The Q&A is for shit like, "Hey, I'm having trouble getting Wyld Wine to proc a certain transformation, am I doing it right?" not "Dear CERN..." technical reports.

Once again apologies that what I'm trying to do isn't good enough.

Again, see my first point.

 

[TheShepard256]

I haven't replied because these are questions I can't answer or even make a reasonable guess as to possible answers.

 

[Undecided]

I haven't replied because these are questions I can't answer or even make a reasonable guess as to possible answers.

Yeah no worries, I've realized it was my error to pose things I'm uncertain of as questions (in the Questions & Answers sub-forum), instead of just assuming they're bugs and belong in the Bug Reports sub-forum.
Better to assume they're bugs and quickly be proven wrong than to pose the issue as a question - when it's way above the technicality of such. From now on the Bug Reports sub-forum is where such should reside.

Thanks for the reply though.