So, when a Cuntsnake merges with your PC does it just bury itself into you and lose it's head or is it just like, forever biting onto your rear?
It loses its head and becomes part of your nervous system.
So, when a Cuntsnake merges with your PC does it just bury itself into you and lose it's head or is it just like, forever biting onto your rear?
Crazy how nature do that.
They lose their heads and merge seamlessly, but there are still some degree of autonomy in them after.
Generally like how the real-life anglerfish does it. (Female absorbs parts of the male anglerfish body thus that antenna-like thing attached to female head)
Uh, no. Yes, the female absorbs the male, but not to become a lure. The male ceases to exist except as a sack of sperm producing flesh on the female, usually near the cloaca.
Edit: At the risk of sounding like an ass, please do research before you say stuff with confidence.
Key word was "like". I never implied that this is "exactly" what the cunt snake does,
at the risk of sounding like an ass, please do understand what you read before you reply like an ass.
You were wrong about the lure, that's what I explained.
"Like" could be used to compare stuff. So reading above, I said like. Again, I never implied that what happens with male and female anglerfish, also happens with the cunt snake and the host. So explaining what the anglerfish lure was, then telling me i should research before I make a comment is an ass move. So again, please back read and understand before making ass comments.
His objection is that you made it sound as if the male anglerfish becomes the lure of the female anglerfish, not that the comparison to cuntsnakes is incorrect.
My objection was him telling me to research first even if i didn't implied or at least compared the male anglerfish's use to a cuntsnake's. What i compared was how the cuntsnake attach, but since I used "like" i never implied that this was how" a cuntsnake actually does it.
But everyone agrees that cuntsnakes work much like male anglerfish (at least, the parasitic ones). It's a good and valid comparison, down to dissolving their heads in both cases. That's not something anyone's objecting to.
Exactly What I tried to say in my very first post in this forum (see above). Then karratech needed to make an ass comment (that research thing he said). So yes, nice welcome to this forum.
Karretch isn't objecting to the comparison, either.
its his research first comment (with the assumption that i implied something)
Female absorbs parts of the male anglerfish body thus that antenna-like thing attached to female head