K
Krynh
Guest
That would be odd seeing as they leave a drawing of themselves behind after they're born
nursery children
- Thread starter cazadore
- Start date
That would be odd seeing as they leave a drawing of themselves behind after they're born
To be fair, I think if someone is going to take the time to write children that will actually go to the nursery, they'll bother to put in a blurb or two.
Well maybe hteir never too young to leave a drawning but too young to be otherwise interactable...ummm *throws weird porn logic*
No serioulsy with TiTS making so much weird stuff normal I wouldn't find it weird their can drawn but otherwise their not wanna interact with PC.
Writing some super short text for been used when their reach X treshold of age...well yeah for one or two childs it's not yet much but for all of them possible to be put in nursery it will make it nigh impossible anyone will feel it's owrth to do this.
If some poeple do find that this machine for faux pregnancy giving weird results after waiting for ages or well that using wait till birth in nursery with such faux pregnancy.... I think it may be more than this 1% of people to play one save for such long
How do you submit a bug report? I also cannot access my Water Princess children
How do you submit a bug report? I also cannot access my Water Princess children
BUg reports are here. Just make new thread there with putting in title aside what bug you got number of the tits version you are using. Well also good thing would be trying to use search option in that subforum or manualy looking over threads names to be sure your bug wasn't already reported before.
It probably has been already. From what I've been reading here, I'm only one of quite a few people not able to interact with my pre-patch kids.
K
Krynh
Guest
From the sounds of it on reading the blog, a fix has been developed but not yet implemented.
You should post that as a report in the bug forums since it shouldn't happen. But on the other hand, why exactly are you taking pictures of TiTS instead of just screenshots?
Those Water Princesses... They melted my cold dead skeleton heart. <3
I need moar. Moar. MOAR. MOAR. MOAR!
I need moar. Moar. MOAR. MOAR. MOAR!
You should post that as a report in the bug forums since it shouldn't happen. But on the other hand, why exactly are you taking pictures of TiTS instead of just screenshots?
Because my laptop wasn't connected to the Internet and my phone was.
You should post that as a report in the bug forums since it shouldn't happen. But on the other hand, why exactly are you taking pictures of TiTS instead of just screenshots?
Also who doesn't like pictures of tits? XP
I wonder if Savin will be constructing missions where Steele teaches each of their water princess' about a specific planet for them to migrate to later in their life or just more interactions with them in general. I know I for one would love to see more of them or even interactions with the Deep Queen through means of their caretaker..
I just wanna see the water princesses help take care of their half-siblings that don't develop as quickly.
I agree and I hope no one piggy backs on my bandwagon looking to reignite the helspawn shitstorm
Done with nominal use of maternity ward in the nursery too (mostly to avoid the phantom womb bug), so damnit, give me some credit.
Last edited:
But what's the harm unless toxic discussions or wrong/seriously outdated information get pulled up... Sometimes something really good might surface - like this seemingly perfect example of a test case for the performance impact of many children... if null_blank is willing to share
Oh, I don't think it's a bad thing. I find thread necros funny, if anything. I just thought there was an odd uptick in them.
That said, if a forum doesn't discourage necros, I think they're actually a good thing. Instead of making new threads where things need to be repeated, it's best to make people read the catalogue. They'll prolly find their answers in the process, and if they don't, their post doesn't add yet another tiny thread to search through for the next person. A lot of forums don't allow necro posting though.
But what's the harm unless toxic discussions or wrong/seriously outdated information get pulled up... Sometimes something really good might surface - like this seemingly perfect example of a test case for the performance impact of many children... if null_blank is willing to share
Performance impact is nil and there is at least one poster here with more kids than my Meadow Steele. Though it kind of sucks I can't interact with some of the milodan kits she had because they're too old now.
The answer is clearly to make more children. Continuously. On loop.
I love the idea of Steele being a breeding machine while trudging around space. Might be why I was so excited when mother husks came out and why I normally pump fertite+ into my character every time...
I'm not really surprised as until recently almost no scene would even access the data let alone do something with it. But while fixing a children related issue recently a 'proper' fix was turned down over performance concerns (we ultimately settled for something else that should work just as good for the current code). Without a test case the discussion was mostly guess work on my part though.