Nullo Nudity

[xenoscene]

I’m not sure if this has been posted about before, but I couldn’t find it anywhere. Sorry if it's been done before.


I expected a genital-less Steele to be able to go bottomless in places where nudity is illegal, like Tavros, but found that this wasn’t the case. I can think of a couple reasons why it would make sense for them to be subject to the same laws:

1. Social norms exist, and people associate going bottomless with genital exposure even if no genitals present are present.
2. Steele still has an ass.

Still, the intention behind making nudity illegal is to keep genitals hidden, so I think it's worth considering making an exception to the rules for genital-less characters. What do other people think of this idea?


As far as I know, changing this would only require coding and not additional writing. If there is any writing that needs to be done, though, I would be happy to do it.

 

[TheShepard256]

Steele still has an ass.

It's probably entirely this. Steele's exposure level only checks if their crotch is exposed if they have genitals, but always checks whether their ass is exposed. It's the same for rooms where nudity is illegal; if your ass is exposed, that's always illegal, but if it's only your crotch exposed and you don't have genitals, that's fine. Note that when I say genitals, I'm including balls (having only balls causes the hasGenitals() function to return false, so the exposure/nudity functions also include a check for balls) but excluding tail-genitals.

 

[xenoscene]

Thanks for verifying that!