D&D with a twist

[the silent god]

i came up with the idea a little while ago of using D&D as a way for newbies and veterans to learn and explore kinks. basically it will play out like normal D&D, where the DM creates a campaign and you roll for your initiatives, but the twist will be that instead of using a purely fantasy world, bits of modern day life will be put into the campaign.

So stuff like going to the local sex shop, and visiting clothes stores to build up your 'wardrobe' depending on what you play. there will be magic and fantasy elements depending on the kinks and limits of the players, and the outcome of theirs roles. For example, a lvl 3 cleric female tried to use bind on a goblin, if they roll a 5 or less they have to be put in bondage for the next 2-4 turns depending on the role, 6-10 will put a restraint on the goblin but if the dm rolls a 10 or higher it breaks the restraint; 11-15 will put the restraint on but the dm has to roll a 16 or higher for it to break. 16-19 the restraints attach and lock, and the dm has to roll a 20 before they break. however if the caster roles a 20 the restraints effect 3 targets but one of the fellow players must also be put into bondage instead of using mp.

i'd like to hear peoples thoughts on if i should try and make a full rulebook and character sheets.

 

[Herod_Hammerstar]

Just whatever you do, don't try to use the Book of Erotic Fantasy, it's absolutely terrible.

 

[Paradox01]

I'm guessing your favorite Book is Necro Fantasy.

 

[Herod_Hammerstar]

I'm guessing your favorite Book is Necro Fantasy.

Never heard of it. My favorite entire book is probably Weapons of Legacy, or maybe the Expanded Psionics Handbook.

 

[TheShepard256]

Never heard of it. My favorite entire book is probably Weapons of Legacy, or maybe the Expanded Psionics Handbook.

He was making a joke about you necroing quite a few threads recently.

 

[Herod_Hammerstar]

Resurrecting a legitimate discussion isn't "necroing", not in the sense of it being a problem. I did see the thread talking about making inane comments on threads discussing long-dead games; Dungeons & Dragons is nothing of the sort (and I'd like to think my comment is a little more substantive than "this looks cool, when is it coming out?").

 

[Rear Admiral Chimera]

It's not about that DnD is still being printed/developed, but that you commented on a thread that hasn't received attention since January. The original poster hasn't been active for months and likely won't respond to your comment. This is exactly what is known as necroposting when it comes to forum etiquette.

 

[Paradox01]

Serial necroposting is the forum version of going to a party where no one knows you, drifting from conversation to conversation going, "Hey guys! Remember two hours ago when you said you thought Die Hard was a Christmas movie? Guess what, I agree!" "Hi guys, remember yesterday when you said you liked Lost? I didn't like it!"

Basically, you're posting like a drunk baby. Is it disruptive? No. Is it annoying as hell? Yes.

 

[Herod_Hammerstar]

Serial necroposting is the forum version of going to a party where no one knows you

Maybe you're the kind of person you naturally fits in at a party. I would ask you to consider having some empathy for those who keep going to parties where nobody knows them, desperately hoping that someone will *get* to know them, and getting more desperate every time they fail.

 

[Balaknightfang]

Resurrecting a legitimate discussion isn't "necroing", not in the sense of it being a problem. I did see the thread talking about making inane comments on threads discussing long-dead games; Dungeons & Dragons is nothing of the sort (and I'd like to think my comment is a little more substantive than "this looks cool, when is it coming out?").

Directly from the rules:

Don't "necromance" threads, which means posting in them and bringing them back to the fore of discussion and activity weeks or months after the most recent post. This is okay, to a degree, if you have something actually pertaining to the subject at hand.

 

[Herod_Hammerstar]

This is okay, to a degree, if you have something actually pertaining to the subject at hand.

Which I did. I wasted $30 buying the BOEF and I want to make sure everybody else knows that they shouldn't do the same.