Cum-Cow Auto-autofellatio tail-cock version also requires a non-tail cock

[LogicalKink]

Verified with decompiled code:

function TT(){
    var e,t=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:-1;
    if(flags.ENCOUNTERS_DISABLED=void 0,InRoomWithFlag(r.tb.WATERFALL))window.restOnWaterfall();
    else{
        clearOutput(),clearBust();
        var o=0;
        if(-1===t){
            if(pc.hasPerk("Auto-Autofellatio")&&pc.hasCock()){
                if(0===pc.perkv1("Auto-Autofellatio")&&pc.canAutoFellate(-1))return void window.cumCowAutoFellatio(!0,280+rand(30)+1);
                if(pc.perkv2("Auto-Autofellatio")<=0&&0===rand(3)&&pc.hasTailCock()&&pc.hasGenitals())return void window.cumCowCockvineSuck();
                if(pc.perkv2("Auto-Autofellatio")<=0&&0===rand(3)&&pc.canAutoFellate(-1))return void window.cumCowAutoFellatio(!0,280+rand(30)+1);
                0===rand(20)&&(JE.r.autoCocknosisDistraction(),o=pc.libido()/3+20)
            }

This definitely seems unintended, given that the scene in question checks pc.hasCock() for text branches.

The autoCocknosisDistraction scene also requires a cock and not only a tailcock, but is written that way, so it's not a bug (even if unfortunate).