Beasts are immune to tease damage yet they should not be to pheromone damage/attacks .

[Papum]

While Beast are immune to tease damage they should be able to receive pheromone damage as that is an form of nature's erotic warfare.

 

[TheShepard256]

If we're talking like, actual animals, and not some of the more animal-like humanoids (e.g. minotaurs, who IIRC have a weakness to it), I'm pretty sure immunity to pheromone damage is because no bestiality. Even if that weren't an issue, you could still justify such an immunity because pheromones are typically species-specific, meaning if you can't reproduce with them (assuming you both have the appropriate genitals and fertility levels, of course) your pheromones can't affect them.

 

[Papum]

If we're talking like, actual animals, and not some of the more animal-like humanoids (e.g. minotaurs, who IIRC have a weakness to it), I'm pretty sure immunity to pheromone damage is because no bestiality. Even if that weren't an issue, you could still justify such an immunity because pheromones are typically species-specific, meaning if you can't reproduce with them (assuming you both have the appropriate genitals and fertility levels, of course) your pheromones can't affect them.

Yes its only beast (non humanoids), it isn't about bestiality per say, just about giving them damage in the form of pheromone damage.
Yet post defeat you wouldn't be able to do anything still while for charm and tease damage they still would remain immune.
But i get it what your getting at, the ideia of flaunting towards the animals, just my ideia was more for ex.: like when a person gets excited/aroused they will release pheromes in the air animals can smell those pheromones and that will get the animals agitated and/or excited mentility/physicaly (like if an real life woman in real life gets excited if there is a dog or any animal nearby they will start to act weird so other type animals can be affected), yet if you would just flaunt your junk there would be no change what so ever in it's behaviour (in essence it's just filling the air with hormonal smells that animals can detect and that impacts them).
And by that certain items could make charmer tease builds more usefull against beast mobs with items like 'Rosebloom shield' or 'Wyvern Venom', also certain powers like 'Estrus Flask', 'Hornet Blade'. Further than that it would be an big no no.

 

[Papum]

If we're talking like, actual animals, and not some of the more animal-like humanoids (e.g. minotaurs, who IIRC have a weakness to it), I'm pretty sure immunity to pheromone damage is because no bestiality. Even if that weren't an issue, you could still justify such an immunity because pheromones are typically species-specific, meaning if you can't reproduce with them (assuming you both have the appropriate genitals and fertility levels, of course) your pheromones can't affect them.

Wrote wrongly in accordance to your response so i edited the above response to be more in line to what you said (it's about other animals not being able to act upon other species hormonal releases wich isn't teh case, like i gave an example above with an real life human female and dog).