Fixed [0.9.145] Anal masturbation should use analCapacityRange

Issue is marked as fixed.

Couch

Scientist
Creator
Aug 26, 2015
1,664
1,031
At the time I originally wrote it, the Butt Finger masturbation scene used a looseness check, which results in it being described as uncomfortable regardless of your capacity. It should be updated to check the new analCapacityRange instead.
 

Theron

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2018
4,217
1,554
45
If you want to be really fancy, some hands are described as bigger or smaller than others.

Female Lapine/Bat (Paws) are small and male Lapine/Bat are large, for example.
 
Last edited:

Jacques00

Administrator
Moderator
Aug 26, 2015
5,342
1,393
Hopefully fixed for the next release. This is a non-standard use of the analCapacity, so I did not want to just compare volume numbers and call it a day, especially since comparing numbers with this scene in particular is a bit of a mess.

When starting a new character, without any bonus adjustments, the character will start off with an anal capacity of about 32 cubic inches. For an adult human finger, its volume can average about 1 to 1.5 cubic inches (I mathed it with primitive geometry and it checks out). As you can tell with those numbers, the starting character can fit about 20 fingers or more, making one of the first masturbation scenes have no variance whatsoever! (For comparison, one 12-inch long, 2-inch thick penis is closer to the 30 cubic inches.)

So with that, I had to bring in a different logic. I pumped up the individual finger volume to 2 cubic inches. While charitable and may be unrealistic, we can excuse it by saying it's the volume up to and including the knuckle. When comparing it to the anal capacity, the first 30 cubic inches will be excluded since we can say that inserting one finger at a time into one opening is not the same as inserting a penis due to the complex shape of the hand. (I did not verify, but an adult human hand, up to the wrist, is about 23 or so cubic inches...) Doing this will allow the fingers to start off being a tight fit (regardless of looseness value)--and looking at other players' save files, I can say that this capacity value will not be that small for long...

If this is a bad approach to solving the logistics of this problem or if I should tweak the numbers further, do let me know.