Search results

I second this. We had several taurs added recently (and more coming) and I'd love to see more taur/taur stuff. More threesome would be amazing. I think having two caracters together with threesome only scenes would work well. Also scenes that use dick/cunt/lip nipple so that they're not...

She is cute, but why doesn't she have bioluminescent markings like others leithans?

The dryad is my favorite folowed by Emmy. Besides them any furry or taur.

I consider it to be the same thing than sergals by that they're both furry created species. That's why I think we should change the chakat specie name. It's not a big deal for the game anyway, it's just changing a specie name for something more generic.

Okay. I didn't know every fiction was considered as existing in Tits. However, saying "all fictions exist in Tits" doesn't mean anything can be in Tits. Otherwise, sergals would already be in the game. So we're back to the copyright problem.

I see your point. We can have a "chakat body" but not "be a chakat".  However, there is still the issue of the belonging of the chakat specie in Tits. How are chakats supposed to exist in Tits? By that I mean chakats aren't a generic specie and the word chakat itself doesn't make sense...

That's why it bothers me. The "canon chakat" description is precise and having just a few elements missing makes me think it's not a chakat. As a side note, the chakat description goes well beyond a physical description. Chakats have a history, customs, a typical behaviour and all of this...

While some caracteristics are here they're not all here, and a chakat is supposed to have all those caracteristics. As such, there is no reason to use "chakat" as a specie instead of "felitaur". Also, copyright is indeed the most important part. As Savin said elswhere we can't use other...

The chakat specie must be changed to felitaur for two reasons. Chakats were created by Bernard Doove a.k.a Chakat Goldfur in the chakat universe, and so is a copyrighted specie. The caracteristics you can have in Tits doesn't match the chakat description (link below). For those who don't...