Which Fallout game is the worst one, in your opinion?
- Thread starter big joe
- Start date
I never played 2, Tactics, 4, or 76.
Based off what I've heard 76 is the worst.
Based off what I've played: Wanderer's Editition > Project Nevada > vanilla NV > 1 > vanilla 3
Based off what I've heard 76 is the worst.
Based off what I've played: Wanderer's Editition > Project Nevada > vanilla NV > 1 > vanilla 3
That's kinda asking which is worst, steak or chicken.
Its two very different tastes. neither is worst and neither is inherently better.
Shadowrun Returns is an example of an isometric game done well. And the original Fallouts were done well, just a product of their time.
So with that in mind, the worst Fallout is Fallout 76. Cack handed support, a clear example of Bethesd'a lacklustre quality control and poorly done development. It really was a terrible game. Still is somewhat. Closely followed by Fallout 4.
Worst Fallout game was Fallout Tactics or FO76
I have 1300 hours in FO4, because I ignored the main story and left whats-his-settlement-needs-help in the museum. Just wandering around getting in trouble looking for supplies to build up your personal base made the game fun.
I have 1300 hours in FO4, because I ignored the main story and left whats-his-settlement-needs-help in the museum. Just wandering around getting in trouble looking for supplies to build up your personal base made the game fun.
II thought the worse was the original xbox exclusive one Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel. "What the fuck Chuck!?!" was the game's unofficial tagline by the fallout community. I'm sure I could more enjoyment out of of tactics or 76 then this piece of rubbish.
General , another settlement needs Minutemen's (yours) help I'll mark it on your map.
1&2 were very good (especially writing imo [cuz stats n choices matter ]) 3 did have some interesting characters and places nv was amazing in everything outside of combat 4 is poorly written but does have really nice combat and gun customization system (Institute would win 100% of the time if bethesda didn't nerf 'em into the ground) , 76's launch was a total shitshow and it really showed off how greedy and incompetent companies can be (Nuka Cola Dark and the Duffel Kerfuffle) however it introduces lots of new interesting enemies (outside of reskinned skyrim dragons) and some insight on things like how nuka cola obtained some of ''their original'' recipes
I don't know why everyone hates Fallout Tactics. I played it years ago and, IIRC, it's not amazing, but there's nothing terrible about it either.
I guess it's because tactics is waaaaaay more different than any other fallout
I started playing the series from the original release, tbh. FO2 is my personal favorite, as the original is easily finished in a single session. New Vegas would be my second choice, though the engine makes aspects of the game less than Black Isle ideal. I'd love to comment on FO3, as I own a copy, but unlike New Vegas it refuses to run on my existant hardware. No clue. NV runs, Oblivion runs, FO3 just crashes. Tactics... Played it all the way through. Still can't bring myself to love FO Tactics. Never played the BOS ARPG, but no one who worked at Black Isle will admit it happened, so....
76 by a longshot, so bad I honestly do not consider it a fallout game. The story in 4 I honestly felt was meh, I really didn't give a shit about anything that was going on in it, would have been so much better if you could take over the institute and start making a difference everywhere. Sadly all the factions were idiots, at least to me.
Of the main games 4 is the most soulless but 2 bothered me for almost immediately going the other way with so much of what the original established and being heavy on the memey side of things.