Yeah, I'm basically using private browsing. In that case, the suicide button is fine. Originally I thought it was some kind of off-the-wall way to unlock new content because I was only seeing the six encounters you get from exploring/staying at home. As if you were intentionally supposed to get annoyed at the grinding and just kill yourself, then suddenly you're in hell fist-fighting giant demon-dongs. I still don't think it's a terrible assumption in an insane world of vagina-based arm locks, rope cocks bursting windows and molesting people, etc, but enough rambling about this. I have other things to ramble about!
First up: CoC and learning from the past.
I'm guessing CoC was the major inspiration for you making this game, but that doesn't mean you have to copy it too closely. As you say, it's simply a placeholder you didn't spend much time on, but it's helpful to lay out plans in advance when making a game so that mechanics come together in a coherent way.
If you're a fan of CoC, you've likely noticed that resting doesn't fully restore you because it costs time and the player may have to choose between resting more (and thus spending more time) or setting off to do something else with reduced health, thus increasing the odds that they'll be defeated for their hastiness. This is all well and good, but you probably also noticed that CoC was recently announced to be complete and yet it never really takes advantage of this restricted time mechanic, so there's no compelling reason to NOT rest to full (ignoring that the PC becomes freakishly powerful and doesn't actually need to recover fully most of the time, because that's an entirely different issue). Yes, there are occasional minor uses of it like needing to visit the library late at night to be able to study, but as a whole the in-game time spent doesn't lead to any meaningful decision-making because if you miss it one day you just roll over to the next, identical day. From a game design perspective this isn't ideal because it eliminates any pressure that would normally arise from having to manage your resources (units of time, in this case), and games without challenge quickly grow tiresome.
That all being said, this is fairly elemental stuff that you may already know, so please don't feel like I'm being condescending towards/attacking you here. I could be completely off-base, as I have no idea what your long-term plans for the game are. I just wanted to submit this for your consideration early, before things get too hairy: If it's going to be a management game (or at least have elements of therefore), you want the player to have to manage resources, otherwise the gameplay (or at least this mechanic of it) ends up rather hollow.
EDIT:
After looking into the higher level battles, I feel like the current battle system is a a bit confusing and the catch-all system you have set up now might not be ideal. It's often a stretch the imaginative attacks enemies use have to fit either in draining your health or raising your lust (the bird and horse are particularly jarring), and the same is occasionally true for having to choose between attacking and seducing (the woman on the bus who sits on you comes to mind). Consider a battle system that is more personalized to the individual encounter. Using the woman on the bus for an example, instead of using the generic attack/seduce until their health/lust expires, you could have options to struggle or speak up or gesture towards other people on the bus for help, and the goal might be to get her attention to get her to stand up, or endure until her stops arrives or subtly work to get her off, etc. Orgy-esque mechanics for the horny graduates. Disgust for the horse rider/siren girl. Mental battles for control with the hypnosis stuff. And so on. There's a lot of flavor to be used if you go this route.
It goes without saying this will dramatically increase your workload, and it may be too ambitious, depending on your programming and game-making experience. I don't know Javascript, so I can't gauge your ability by looking at your code, so you'll have to make your own assessment on if you're up to the task or not, assuming the idea catches your fancy. I do feel it would fit the thematic better though, since the vast majority of the encounters in your game are not battles as portrayed in CoC, so transcribing that battle system over leaves things to be desired.
Okay, enough stuffy, nebulous "game design" shit. I briefly played around with the patched version and here are my findings.
It seems the bird is the easiest encounter, so the removal of frequently encountering it has spiked the early-game difficulty; all the other encounters kick your ass unless the RNG is heavily on your side. This issue is further exacerbated by allowing the player to wander into the higher level areas so early (though if that's intentional it's probably fine because the player can see they just took twice their max lust in a single attack and realize they're not supposed to be there). This probably sounds like I'm backtracking because when I played the previous version, discovering new areas was so uncommon that I genuinely thought the mechanic was broken, but you understand there's something to be said for a happy medium and steady progression.
I like my games difficult so I wouldn't mention this if I didn't think it would be bad enough to be considered obstructive by a reasonable person, and it's definitely at that point when I burned through thirty encounters and only fought the bird five times, almost always losing to every other encounter type. A new player running into the same thing would likely be turned off the game altogether. Honestly, the only reason I keep playing past ten minutes when I first started was because I knew there was a lot more than just the six encounters I was seeing. Even if you want to avoid cuddling players and keep the dangerous areas available, keep in mind the importance of first impressions and a steady upwards curve in difficulty.
Regarding mija, I don't know that I would call it a term for friends of the family (at least in my part of the US), but it's fitting enough here if you want to use it. Sometimes women call their husband or boyfriend mijo, and it can be reasonably translated as something like "honey" or "dear," which seems appropriate if she's a motherly type. As is generally the case with gendered languages, the gender-neutral version is the masculine: "mijo."
Do you want me to report typos?
---
Text for your eyes to glaze over.
