Lacking Spells that are not [At-Will] powers to Generate and Hold threat aswell as giving some defensive buffs for an White Mage Tank. (aka Paladin)

[Papum]

There is an lacking of not [At-Will] Threat powers that also give defensive buffs in-game for the White Mage class currently. So i thaught seeing the white mage Encounter spell "Seal of Light" Cait usses in her 'Vestal Raiments' set to be an nice addition for MC ussages for any tanky White Mage class build (aka paladin).
So what i mean is an option that is not an [At-Will] power but could generate steady threat and also have some in-built defensive buffs aswell, so you could equip the Dawnbringer sword for example and use it's 'deflect' power instead or any other [At-Will] power.)

(P.s. - in remarks of some suggestions below i had to edit this post this to clarify better what i intended in making the post.)

 

[Anonymous Bat]

I find that Lay on Hands works exceptionally well for maintaining threat on a tanky White Mage build. It's also an iconic paladin ability!

 

[IraMorti]

Lay on Hands like Bat said, or use Flamebrand or Thunderbrand. You could also mix in warrior powers.

 

[Papum]

I find that Lay on Hands works exceptionally well for maintaining threat on a tanky White Mage build. It's also an iconic paladin ability!

True that exists as mentioned above some others aswell but they are all [At-Will] powers, and there are so many other [At-Will] that would be better to use instead like in the Warrior power section, because they also give defensive buffs wich the current powers for threat generation of a White Mage lacks. Thats why i made this threat to give an option that is not an [At-Will] power so you could equip the Dawnbringer sword for example and use it's 'deflect' power instead or any other [At-Will] power. Probably if 'Lay on Hands' were to be an [Recharge] power that would solve this aswell.

 

[Papum]

Lay on Hands like Bat said, or use Flamebrand or Thunderbrand. You could also mix in warrior powers.

What i mentioned at the above reply, will have to edit better what i meant it seems.