But what about Vajajays?

[Aelana]

I love how much variety CoC2 has in, well... cocks, interestingly enough. But I am missing some more variety in kinky vags. I think a lot of vag content still has not been written yet.

Since life has given me a possible timeslot for kinky stuff, I thought I may, maybe, if life does not take it back away, try pushing on vagina expansions. Maybe start out with cum transformatives, that only change cum/girlcum type (similar to how knotty peppers can be found, but only add a knot to your cock).

Eventually, I want to push towards new vags, and maybe a vag equivalent to tge knotted flag. Something that is a lot of people's kink, but easy enough so it is not impossible to write for.

But I am also do not have any great idea. The sexiest thing to me so far is TiTS vanae vag. So, it's kinda a 'what would you like to be added' thread but purely for vag stuff. With what kinda special vag do you want to be running around, regardless of the realities of CoC2?

 

[Paradox01]

While TiTS does allow for a wider variety of vaginas, there's still not a lot of specific scenes written for them. My Steele used to have a mouthgina (complete with tongue) until I realized that only the bare minimum of descriptors were used in sex scenes.

 

[Kesil]

I wonder why do people use the word "vagina" to talk about, say, the vulva.

But yeah, games could do with more genital models.

 

[Paradox01]

I wonder why do people use the word "vagina" to talk about, say, the vulva.

1) Most people aren't familiar with anatomical names.

2) There's no socially acceptable catch-all term for it like there is for the penis. It's understood that when people say "vagina", they're referring to both the vulva and the actual vagina.

2a) It's a euphemism for "pussy".

 

[Balaknightfang]

I wonder why do people use the word "vagina" to talk about, say, the vulva.

you want the timestamp 3:45

 

[Kesil]

Most people aren't familiar with anatomical names.

You learn those names in the fourth year of primary school IIRC.

There's no socially acceptable catch-all term for it like there is for the penis.

How about "female genitalia"? (You can replace "genitalia" with "bits" or whatever.)

It's understood that when people say "vagina", they're referring to both the vulva and the actual vagina.

I understand that "vagina" means "canal between vulva and womb", not "vulva and vagina". It'd be like saying that "penis" refers to the urethra.

It's a euphemism for "pussy".

Which still means "vulva". Meow.

 

[Preacher]

In my opinion the vagina should have just been named a "canal" like how the length of the penis is just called a "shaft".

Let vagina be a catch-all like how penis is a catch-all. It's already culturally ingrained so why not roll with it? It would remove a fuckton of confusion, misconceptions, and internet argument AHKTUALLY(ies). Of course I doubt anyone will ever listen to a bunch of perverts on some smut game's forum.

 

[Paradox01]

2a) It's a euphemism for "pussy".

Which still means "vulva". Meow.

Uh, no, wrong. Well, not the whole truth, let's put it that way. The word "pussy" is commonly used to refer to both the vulva and vagina. Have you ever heard a woman in a porno scream, "Fuck my pussy! But that dick better not touch my vagina, mister! I'm not letting you past my vulva, this is only the first time you've come over to fix the cable!"

"Fine, then can I fuck your ass?"

"Absolutely! But only the buttocks, nothing goes into my anus."

"Goddamn pedantic. Last time I try to seduce a medical student..."


And that's what pedantry does, @Kesil. It takes all of the romance out of porn. Is that what you want? Why do you hate freedom?

 

[Kesil]

I care about language in written media, which porn films aren't

Perhaps, this may stem from an issue: female genitalia may be seen as "more hidden/difficult to understand" than the male counterpart. And this goes along with writers/players' tastes and demography, with males being the bulk of it.
Of course, this theory may be debunked with the "rear/buttocks/anus" example, which is something we all have XD

Considering the TF scope of the game, some may feel that elements that are considered essential for male genitalia are yet to be considered for the female counterparts. This is an issue I am interested in (to the point of theorycrafting for TiTS - yes, you can bring it back anytime!). But I know I am not the kind of player Fengames cater to, and the writers might not be into vagina-vulva-clitoris-labia descriptions.

 

[Tobey Maguire]

I like how this turned from "what vagina type do you want added to CoC2" to discussing the proper term for female genitals.

 

[Preacher]

Ah yes, OP.

In that case I'll take prehensile bioluminescent labia that can close like the fingers of two hands coming together, a clitoris that like a mixture between an angler fish's angler and a star-nosed mole's nose, a vagina with rings of glowing nubs, and a cervix like a circular ziggurat with its top central ring like an angel's halo.

What does the rest of the body look like? Fucked if I know. They wanted variety. More sci-fi than fantasy? Probably, but...

regardless of the realities of CoC2

BTW a knot variant for cunts would basically just be one with extra muscles for squeezing tighter and not letting go during orgasm, or one where the lips swell as if having been pumped.

 

[Aelana]

BTW a knot variant for cunts would basically just be one with extra muscles for squeezing tighter and not letting go during orgasm, or one where the lips swell as if having been pumped.

Nah, I compared it to 'knot' in the sense that its a flag that writers can actually support. Maybe it's the tongue flag in the vulva's case. If I remember right, the knotted flag in TiTS also was supported retro-actively. IMO when people read hot knotted scenes with Siri+ friends and wanted to do the same.

I am a sucker for bioluminescence though

 

[Aelana]

Considering the TF scope of the game, some may feel that elements that are considered essential for male genitalia are yet to be considered for the female counterparts. This is an issue I am interested in (to the point of theorycrafting for TiTS - yes, you can bring it back anytime!). But I know I am not the kind of player Fengames cater to, and the writers might not be into vagina-vulva-clitoris-labia descriptions.

Isn't it weird how most men are at the same time very turned on, and very weirded out by a vulva (just to clarify, I do not come from an english speaking country. Here, I haven't heard anybody use vulva in sex-ed. Everybody said vagina back in my days). IMO trans-women pre-op/no-op should be the ideal straight-man's partner. I mean, she has tits, and you are not weirded out by what she has between her legs. What more can you wish for? But alas...

I do not like ths demographic argument pretty much for anything. It has become such common practice that people think it is common knowledge. It is not. It is based on shaky ideas at best. The reason why people at the top of companies use it all the time to justify things is:

1. That's what they were taught in their expensive business school.
2. They are just as dumb as you and I.

The only exceptional thing about them is they are exceptionally massive cunts.

I do not like how suddenly they have become the arbiters to what art should be like. And I still believe that, especially in a game like TiTS/CoC, there is a prime opportunity to expand the kinkyness without pissing off the penis fans.

Speaking of which, I am a bit disheartened that you already tried it in TiTS, and it doesn't look like the vulva stuff has been expanded a lot in the last two years. Not when compared to the knotting support. What did happen to the whole thing?

 

[Preacher]

My guess is that nobody actually got to the writing part of it, it just looks like a series of discussions/suggestions to me. If that's the case then you're a step ahead than most. If someone did actually write something then I don't know what happened.

 

[Kesil]

I do not like ths demographic argument pretty much for anything. It has become such common practice that people think it is common knowledge. It is not. It is based on shaky ideas at best.

Years ago, there was a questionnaire of sorts on the main blog and those were the results. Of course, things may have changed since then.

And I still believe that, especially in a game like TiTS/CoC, there is a prime opportunity to expand the kinkyness without pissing off the penis fans.

Same here.

What did happen to the whole thing?

What Preacher said. Still, and for as long as TiTS is being in development, people can use the thread I opened.

 

[Aelana]

What Preacher said. Still, and for as long as TiTS is being in development, people can use the thread I opened.

So... Less talking and more kinky stuff... Olay

 

[sumgai]

So... Less talking and more kinky stuff... Olay

That can be worked with. Pull them pants down! ~

But... as for what kind of female genitalia TFs. Hmm... more wetness, flavored wetness... or maybe go the Wicked City route with some Vagina Dentata. Though that would only apply to Nightmare Fetishists.

 

[dav556]

Not quite. If the Vagina has teeth, they could possibly be made of hardened muscle or something similar to gums