Recent content by Alypia

You can see her like that already. It's for .

Although the content is designed so that writers don't have to differentiate a player ghostlight from a cock (and many don't), I think that it's more fun to at least touch on the distinctions. So, for example, instead of stroking the cock hard, like you'd do with a real cock, I like to write...

Oh dear. Looks like I used [etheryn.cock] instead of [etheryn.cockNoun]. Stupid parsers. Looks like a copy and paste mistake - it's undoubled in the original document. Thanks for the help!

do y'all also think that all characters who don't have penises and are written in a "lover role" should be able to get them so as to be able to impregnate a PC who doesn't have a penis

That's a bug. The event should only occur in imp fights in the Undermountain. Thanks for noticing!

Depends on the writer and scene.

Y'all didn't think that the Cait anal conversation was romantic? Tch.

The PC cannot knot Annika in that scene, no. I wanted to make sure that a PC's knot wasn't ignored, so there's mention of the knot and Anni gives it a little extra massaging, but the position was awkward enough that I felt it would be uncomfortable for all parties to knot there.

To what are you referring here?

That's what they're complaining about.

Hi there! So your post went to some places. I think you went a little far afield of the discussion, so I'm going to try to stay focused. Mostly, I'm not sure how the argument that this is a source of ambiguity works. In the first part of this thread you focused your explanation of Oxana's evil...

You are certainly free to believe that if you wish.

What I'm getting from this thread is that most of the people posting in it who express ambiguity about Evergreen's evil play player characters with penises, or just don't read, because it blows my mind that anybody could see Oxana telling the PC "I'll give you [item], but only if you let me...

You don't get the crown, I guess.

You're not the only one, but .